On Tuesday, 19 January 2021 at 18:04:42 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 January 2021 at 17:44:03 UTC, Rempas wrote:
Oh ok! So there is not advantage from using it like faster
compile time, better performance etc. right?
The default betterC build will compile about a quarter second
On Tuesday, 19 January 2021 at 17:44:03 UTC, Rempas wrote:
Oh ok! So there is not advantage from using it like faster
compile time, better performance etc. right?
The default betterC build will compile about a quarter second
faster than the default normal D build, but runtime performance
is
On Tuesday, 19 January 2021 at 17:44:03 UTC, Rempas wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 January 2021 at 17:40:52 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
betterC is a niche restricted feature set. If you don't
already have a use case in mind, I'd recommend avoiding it.
It is for cases where you're stuck with certain
On Tuesday, 19 January 2021 at 17:40:52 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
betterC is a niche restricted feature set. If you don't already
have a use case in mind, I'd recommend avoiding it.
It is for cases where you're stuck with certain limitations to
integrate with the outside world. Like running
betterC is a niche restricted feature set. If you don't already
have a use case in mind, I'd recommend avoiding it.
It is for cases where you're stuck with certain limitations to
integrate with the outside world. Like running on peculiar
hardware or interoperating with certain outside
