On Monday 08 August 2011 09:42:15 simendsjo wrote:
I'm writing here because I haven't been able to create a smaller example
and I'm not sure what to search for in bugzilla.
DMD adds a storage identifier twice when writing .di files.
This is my code:
///
static @property
On 08.08.2011 09:47, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday 08 August 2011 09:42:15 simendsjo wrote:
I'm writing here because I haven't been able to create a smaller example
and I'm not sure what to search for in bugzilla.
DMD adds a storage identifier twice when writing .di files.
This is my code:
On Monday, August 08, 2011 12:54:00 AM, simendsjo wrote:
On 08.08.2011 09:47, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6360
Thanks. The annoying thing is that I have to manually modify the import
library :|
Could spend the time fixing dmd instead of working
On 08.08.2011 09:57, Brad Roberts wrote:
On Monday, August 08, 2011 12:54:00 AM, simendsjo wrote:
On 08.08.2011 09:47, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6360
Thanks. The annoying thing is that I have to manually modify the import library
:|
Could spend
On 08.08.2011 10:01, simendsjo wrote:
On 08.08.2011 09:47, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday 08 August 2011 09:42:15 simendsjo wrote:
I'm writing here because I haven't been able to create a smaller example
and I'm not sure what to search for in bugzilla.
DMD adds a storage identifier twice
On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 04:01:17 -0400, simendsjo simend...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08.08.2011 09:47, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday 08 August 2011 09:42:15 simendsjo wrote:
I'm writing here because I haven't been able to create a smaller
example
and I'm not sure what to search for in bugzilla.
On 08.08.2011 15:33, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 04:01:17 -0400, simendsjo simend...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08.08.2011 09:47, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday 08 August 2011 09:42:15 simendsjo wrote:
I'm writing here because I haven't been able to create a smaller
example
simendsjo:
Is this by design, or just an implementation oddity?
Or a design oddity?
Bye,
bearophile