Kagamin пишет:
Weed Wrote:
it is impossible to create the struct of the object which will be
arbitrary size (raised by a user) + to be able to set compile-time +
should work with the structures of its type.
this is mathematical matrix, for example
Matix? Easy.
class Matrix //can inherit f
Weed Wrote:
> it is impossible to create the struct of the object which will be
> arbitrary size (raised by a user) + to be able to set compile-time +
> should work with the structures of its type.
>
> this is mathematical matrix, for example
Matix? Easy.
class Matrix //can inherit from some
Bill Baxter пишет:
2008/12/16 Weed :
Frits van Bommel пишет:
Weed wrote:
In C++, we had the problem - "slicing" objects.
In D this problem is solved inability to inherit from structs.
Without inheritance of structs many things are not possible, compared
with C++.
Why, instead of the complete i
Bill Baxter пишет:
2008/12/16 Weed :
Frits van Bommel пишет:
Weed wrote:
In C++, we had the problem - "slicing" objects.
In D this problem is solved inability to inherit from structs.
Without inheritance of structs many things are not possible, compared
with C++.
Why, instead of the complete i
Bill Baxter пишет:
2008/12/16 Weed :
Frits van Bommel пишет:
Weed wrote:
In C++, we had the problem - "slicing" objects.
In D this problem is solved inability to inherit from structs.
Without inheritance of structs many things are not possible, compared
with C++.
Why, instead of the complete i
2008/12/16 Weed :
> Frits van Bommel пишет:
>>
>> Weed wrote:
>>>
>>> In C++, we had the problem - "slicing" objects.
>>> In D this problem is solved inability to inherit from structs.
>>> Without inheritance of structs many things are not possible, compared
>>> with C++.
>>> Why, instead of the co
Frits van Bommel пишет:
Weed wrote:
In C++, we had the problem - "slicing" objects.
In D this problem is solved inability to inherit from structs.
Without inheritance of structs many things are not possible, compared
with C++.
Why, instead of the complete inability to inherit, just do not make
Kagamin пишет:
Weed Wrote:
Without inheritance of structs many things are not possible, compared
with C++.
for example?
it is impossible to create the struct of the object which will be
arbitrary size (raised by a user) + to be able to set compile-time +
should work with the struc
Frits van Bommel пишет:
Weed wrote:
In C++, we had the problem - "slicing" objects.
In D this problem is solved inability to inherit from structs.
Without inheritance of structs many things are not possible, compared
with C++.
Why, instead of the complete inability to inherit, just do not make
Weed wrote:
In C++, we had the problem - "slicing" objects.
In D this problem is solved inability to inherit from structs.
Without inheritance of structs many things are not possible, compared
with C++.
Why, instead of the complete inability to inherit, just do not make
impossible to up casting
Weed Wrote:
> Without inheritance of structs many things are not possible, compared
> with C++.
for example?
Weed пишет:
Why, instead of the complete inability to inherit, just do not make
impossible to up casting struct type by value.
It's a question:
Why, instead of the complete inability to inherit, just do not make
impossible to up casting struct type by value?
Bill Baxter пишет:
2008/12/15 Weed :
Bill Baxter пишет:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Weed wrote:
Who can provide a link to an explanation about why in D has taken to
distinguish between classes and structures?
(Sorry for my bad English)
The main justification is eliminating the slicing
2008/12/15 Weed :
> Weed пишет:
>>
>> Bill Baxter пишет:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Weed wrote:
Who can provide a link to an explanation about why in D has taken to
distinguish between classes and structures?
(Sorry for my bad English)
>>>
>>> The main j
2008/12/15 Weed :
> Bill Baxter пишет:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Weed wrote:
>>>
>>> Who can provide a link to an explanation about why in D has taken to
>>> distinguish between classes and structures?
>>>
>>> (Sorry for my bad English)
>>>
>>
>> The main justification is eliminating
Weed пишет:
Bill Baxter пишет:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Weed wrote:
Who can provide a link to an explanation about why in D has taken to
distinguish between classes and structures?
(Sorry for my bad English)
The main justification is eliminating the slicing problem.
http://cplusplu
Bill Baxter пишет:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Weed wrote:
Who can provide a link to an explanation about why in D has taken to
distinguish between classes and structures?
(Sorry for my bad English)
The main justification is eliminating the slicing problem.
http://cplusplusgems.blogspo
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Weed wrote:
> Who can provide a link to an explanation about why in D has taken to
> distinguish between classes and structures?
>
> (Sorry for my bad English)
>
The main justification is eliminating the slicing problem.
http://cplusplusgems.blogspot.com/2005/10/w
18 matches
Mail list logo
