On Saturday, 1 August 2015 at 04:11:02 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Walter observes that if you are a Java programmer and start
writing D, you will write D like you write Java. And so I
suppose one will see what one doesn't have in Java, but not so
much the benefits of D. That's true of other
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 21:35:30 UTC, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 19:13:18 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 17:14:29 UTC, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 16:09:23 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 03:30:20 UTC, Kyoji
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 03:30:20 UTC, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
So idk, it feels silly and counterproductive to have D not able
to natively use C libraries. Are we just gonna have to write D
bindings to every notable library out there? Also I don't see
how it'd be problematic, if you don't want a
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 16:09:23 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 03:30:20 UTC, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
So idk, it feels silly and counterproductive to have D not
able to natively use C libraries. Are we just gonna have to
write D bindings to every notable library out there?
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 17:14:29 UTC, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 16:09:23 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 03:30:20 UTC, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
So idk, it feels silly and counterproductive to have D not
able to natively use C libraries. Are we just gonna
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 19:13:18 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 17:14:29 UTC, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 16:09:23 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 03:30:20 UTC, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
So idk, it feels silly and counterproductive to have
On Thursday, 30 July 2015 at 01:14:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 July 2015 at 18:42:45 UTC, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
Thanks for the replies,
This issue really highlights one of D's weak points I think.
I've atleast got a round about solution almost working. :P
Really? I see it as
On Thursday, 30 July 2015 at 11:32:10 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Thursday, 30 July 2015 at 01:14:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 July 2015 at 18:42:45 UTC, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
Thanks for the replies,
This issue really highlights one of D's weak points I think.
I've atleast got a
On 2015-07-29 20:42, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
Thanks for the replies,
This issue really highlights one of D's weak points I think.
I've atleast got a round about solution almost working. :P
You might want to check out Calypso [1] as well.
[1]
Thanks for the replies,
This issue really highlights one of D's weak points I think.
I've atleast got a round about solution almost working. :P
On 07/29/2015 10:59 AM, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
How would I use a C function that's returning a struct?
The binding file must have a matching D struct.
auto doesn't
work here, and from what I can tell D can't import C headers. (If it
really can't then, that would be a very welcome feature)
On Wednesday, 29 July 2015 at 17:59:26 UTC, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
How would I use a C function that's returning a struct? auto
doesn't work here, and from what I can tell D can't import C
headers. (If it really can't then, that would be a very welcome
feature)
I do have the required libs but I
On Wednesday, 29 July 2015 at 17:59:26 UTC, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
How would I use a C function that's returning a struct? auto
doesn't work here, and from what I can tell D can't import C
headers. (If it really can't then, that would be a very welcome
feature)
I do have the required libs but I
On Wednesday, 29 July 2015 at 18:42:45 UTC, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
Thanks for the replies,
This issue really highlights one of D's weak points I think.
I've atleast got a round about solution almost working. :P
Really? I see it as one of D's strengths. It's much easier to
connect D with C than
14 matches
Mail list logo
