On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 10:40:06 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 00:50:16 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Ali
Now benchmarks write and read separately:
I benchmarked my first results:
D:\visd\raw\raw\Release>raw
time write msecs:457
time read msecs:75
This is for 160MB of data
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 11:06:34 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 10:40:06 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Couldn't the chunk logic be deduced aswell?
Yes :)
See update at:
https://github.com/nordlow/justd/blob/a633b52876388921ec49c189f374746f7b4d8c93/tests/t_rawio.d
What would a su
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 10:40:06 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Couldn't the chunk logic be deduced aswell?
Yes :)
See update at:
https://github.com/nordlow/justd/blob/a633b52876388921ec49c189f374746f7b4d8c93/tests/t_rawio.d
What would a suitable value for `preferred_disk_write_size` be?
Is ther
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 00:50:16 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Ali
Now benchmarks write and read separately:
https://github.com/nordlow/justd/blob/0d746b2c1800a82a61a6cb7edcabfd9664066b2c/tests/t_rawio.d
Couldn't the chunk logic be deduced aswell? Something like:
void rawWriteInAutoChunks(R)(F
On 08/08/2015 07:07 PM, Jay Norwood wrote:
> On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 00:50:16 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> // NOTE: No need to tell rawRead the type as double
>> iota(10, 20_000_000 + 10, n)
>> .each!(a => f.rawRead(dbv));
>> }
>>
>> Ali
>
> Your f.rawRead(dbv) f
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 00:50:16 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
// NOTE: No need to tell rawRead the type as double
iota(10, 20_000_000 + 10, n)
.each!(a => f.rawRead(dbv));
}
Ali
Your f.rawRead(dbv) form compiles, but f.rawRead!(dbv) results in
an error msg in c
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 00:50:16 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
{
auto f = File(fn,"wb");
iota(10.5, 20_000_010.5, 1.0)
.chunks(100)
.each!(a => f.rawWrite(a.array));
}
Ali
Thanks. There are many examples of numeric to string data output
in t
On 08/08/2015 04:11 PM, Jay Norwood wrote:
I'm playing around with the range based operations and with raw file
io. I couldn't figure out a way to get rid of the outer foreach loops.
When the body of the foreach loop performs something, then
std.algorithm.each can be useful:
import std.algo
