On Tuesday, 8 November 2016 at 14:55:53 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Indeed, you should not. I'm saying this type of error can
explain the observed behavior.
The original post I responded to said "I don't know if the
double free problem is related to this."
-Steve
Okay. I thought
On 11/8/16 6:26 AM, bachmeier wrote:
On Monday, 7 November 2016 at 02:22:35 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Imagine a resource wrapper like so:
class Foo
{
int *mem;
this() { mem = cast(int *)malloc(int.sizeof); }
~this() { .free(mem); }
}
Now, you have a problem if you do something
On Tuesday, 8 November 2016 at 11:53:37 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 November 2016 at 11:26:55 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
Is there a valid use case for something like this? Why would
you want to do anything inside ~this with GC memory?
If we assume it's a C++
On Tuesday, 8 November 2016 at 11:26:55 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
Is there a valid use case for something like this? Why would
you want to do anything inside ~this with GC memory?
If we assume it's a C++ attachment/library/object using
different memory allocation?
On Monday, 7 November 2016 at 02:22:35 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Imagine a resource wrapper like so:
class Foo
{
int *mem;
this() { mem = cast(int *)malloc(int.sizeof); }
~this() { .free(mem); }
}
Now, you have a problem if you do something like this:
class Bar
{
Foo foo;
On Tuesday, 8 November 2016 at 07:39:12 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 November 2016 at 06:04:59 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 November 2016 at 05:36:22 UTC, Era Scarecrow
wrote:
Hmmm.. I had the impression that if something was referenced
by another object, then it couldn't
On Tuesday, 8 November 2016 at 06:04:59 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 November 2016 at 05:36:22 UTC, Era Scarecrow
wrote:
Hmmm.. I had the impression that if something was referenced
by another object, then it couldn't be collected,
Another *live* object, I.e. reachable from globals
On Tuesday, 8 November 2016 at 05:36:22 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
Hmmm.. I had the impression that if something was referenced
by another object, then it couldn't be collected,
Another *live* object, i.e. reachable from globals and stack.
If you have a big tree and it becomes unreachable
On Tuesday, 8 November 2016 at 03:27:32 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Err that makes no sense... If that's the case why have a
destructor at all?
To free non-GC resources.
http://dlang.org/spec/class.html#destructors
"Furthermore, the order in which the garbage collector calls
On 11/6/16 11:01 PM, thedeemon wrote:
On Monday, 7 November 2016 at 02:22:35 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
OP: it's not legal to destroy or even access GC allocated members in a
destructor. The GC may have already destroyed that data.
Isn't destroy() fine there? It doesn't call destructors
On 11/6/16 10:57 PM, Era Scarecrow wrote:
On Monday, 7 November 2016 at 02:22:35 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
OP: it's not legal to destroy or even access GC allocated members in a
destructor. The GC may have already destroyed that data. I would
recommend printing the stack trace when you
On Monday, 7 November 2016 at 02:22:35 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
OP: it's not legal to destroy or even access GC allocated
members in a destructor. The GC may have already destroyed that
data. I would recommend printing the stack trace when you get
the exception, and figure out where
On Monday, 7 November 2016 at 02:22:35 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
OP: it's not legal to destroy or even access GC allocated
members in a destructor. The GC may have already destroyed that
data.
Isn't destroy() fine there? It doesn't call destructors for
already destroyed objects, so I
On Sunday, 6 November 2016 at 21:46:52 UTC, Øivind wrote:
Hi,
My app occasionally gives me a
*** Error in `./hauto-test': double free or corruption
(fasttop): 0x7f504c002a60 ***
but gives me the following on every termination
On 11/6/16 5:15 PM, Lodovico Giaretta wrote:
On Sunday, 6 November 2016 at 21:46:52 UTC, Øivind wrote:
Hi,
My app occasionally gives me a
*** Error in `./hauto-test': double free or corruption (fasttop):
0x7f504c002a60 ***
but gives me the following on every termination
15 matches
Mail list logo
