On 2015-03-06 at 00:25, ketmar wrote:
unicode sux[1].
[1] http://file.bestmx.net/ee/articles/uni_vs_code.pdf
Great article. Thanks, Кетмар
⚠ ∑ ♫ ⚽ ☀ ☕ ☺ ≡ ♛
On Friday, 6 March 2015 at 00:53:49 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
It made me happy that I was not the only person who has been
ruminating over alphabet as the crucial piece in this whole
Unicode story. I've been giving the example of if I have a
company name as the string ali jim, the uppercase of
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 16:36:35 +0100, FG wrote:
Damn those composite characters!
or invisible ones. or RTL switch.
unicode sux[1].
[1] http://file.bestmx.net/ee/articles/uni_vs_code.pdf
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 03/05/2015 03:25 PM, ketmar wrote:
unicode sux[1].
[1] http://file.bestmx.net/ee/articles/uni_vs_code.pdf
Thanks. I enjoyed the article and I agree with everything said in there.
It made me happy that I was not the only person who has been ruminating
over alphabet as the crucial piece
On 2015-03-05 at 10:42, Kagamin wrote:
string s;
char[] b = cast(char[])asArray();
b[0..s.length] = s[];
It's a bit more complicated than that if you include cutting string for buffers
with smaller capacity, doing so respecting UTF-8, and adding a '\0' sentinel,
since you may want to use the
string s;
char[] b = cast(char[])asArray();
b[0..s.length] = s[];
On Thursday, 5 March 2015 at 09:42:53 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
string s;
char[] b = cast(char[])asArray();
b[0..s.length] = s[];
Thank you very much. I should stop my developing , and read the
dlang tutorial again.
