Re: html documentation should show public imports

2013-07-18 Thread H. S. Teoh
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 09:21:08PM -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote: On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 17:39:19 Timothee Cour wrote: std.range shouldn't contain public import std.array. It's done because otherwise std.range is useless with arrays, and arrays are probably the most frequently used

Re: html documentation should show public imports

2013-07-18 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Thursday, 18 July 2013 at 00:39:33 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote: std.range contains public import std.array. There are a few full module public imports like that in phobos. What's the rationale? I understand for hierarchical modules (breaking modules into packages) but for this? I'm pretty

Re: html documentation should show public imports

2013-07-17 Thread bearophile
Timothee Cour: 1) html documentation should show public imports (sometimes such public imports make sense) 2) std.range shouldn't contain public import std.array. Sounds good. Bye, bearophile

Re: html documentation should show public imports

2013-07-17 Thread Jonathan M Davis
On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 17:39:19 Timothee Cour wrote: std.range shouldn't contain public import std.array. It's done because otherwise std.range is useless with arrays, and arrays are probably the most frequently used type of range. We lose nothing by having that public import. Now,