On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 12:29:26 +
"yawniek" wrote:
> On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 11:45:00 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> > On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 09:12:32 UTC, yawniek wrote:
> >> [...]
> >
> > Can you try it without write operation (comment out all write)?
> > And than try it without uncompr
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 11:45:00 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 09:12:32 UTC, yawniek wrote:
[...]
Can you try it without write operation (comment out all write)?
And than try it without uncompression?
// without compression:
void main(string[] args)
{
auto f =
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 09:12:32 UTC, yawniek wrote:
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 08:50:11 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
> ldc[2] -O -release -boundscheck=off -singleobj app.d
ldc 0.15.2 beta2
2.86s user 0.55s system 77% cpu 4.392 total
v2.068-devel-8f81ffc
2.86s user 0.67s system 78% cpu 4.47
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 08:50:11 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
> ldc[2] -O -release -boundscheck=off -singleobj app.d
ldc 0.15.2 beta2
2.86s user 0.55s system 77% cpu 4.392 total
v2.068-devel-8f81ffc
2.86s user 0.67s system 78% cpu 4.476 total
v2.067
2.88s user 0.67s system 78% cpu 4.529 tota
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 08:42:45 +
"yawniek" wrote:
> On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 08:24:11 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
>
> > can you try it with ldc?
> >
> > ldc[2] -O -release -boundscheck=off -singleobj app.d
>
>
> ldc 0.15.2 beta2
> 2.86s user 0.55s system 77% cpu 4.392 total
>
> v2.068-dev
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 08:24:11 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
can you try it with ldc?
ldc[2] -O -release -boundscheck=off -singleobj app.d
ldc 0.15.2 beta2
2.86s user 0.55s system 77% cpu 4.392 total
v2.068-devel-8f81ffc
2.86s user 0.67s system 78% cpu 4.476 total
v2.067
2.88s user 0.67s
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 08:13:01 +
"yawniek" wrote:
> On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 08:05:01 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
> > import
> > std.zlib,
> > std.file,
> > std.stdio,
> > std.conv;
> >
> > void main(string[] args)
> > {
> > auto f = File(args[1], "rb");
> > auto uncompressor = new
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 08:13:01 +
"yawniek" wrote:
> On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 08:05:01 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
> > import
> > std.zlib,
> > std.file,
> > std.stdio,
> > std.conv;
> >
> > void main(string[] args)
> > {
> > auto f = File(args[1], "rb");
> > auto uncompressor = new
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 08:05:01 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
import
std.zlib,
std.file,
std.stdio,
std.conv;
void main(string[] args)
{
auto f = File(args[1], "rb");
auto uncompressor = new UnCompress(HeaderFormat.gzip);
foreach (buffer; f.byChunk(4096))
{
auto uncomp
On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 09:43:25 +0200
Daniel Kozák wrote:
>
> On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 07:36:39 +
> "yawniek" wrote:
>
> > On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 07:29:15 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
> > > Which compiler and version. There has been some performance
> > > problem with IO on OSX, it should be fix
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 08:01:27 +
"yawniek" wrote:
> On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 07:48:25 UTC, yawniek wrote:
> > On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 07:43:25 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
> > the fastest version i could come up so far is below.
> > std.conv slows it down.
> > going from a 4kb to a 4mb buff
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 07:48:25 UTC, yawniek wrote:
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 07:43:25 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
the fastest version i could come up so far is below.
std.conv slows it down.
going from a 4kb to a 4mb buffer helped. now i'm within 30% of
gzcat's performance.
ok maybe not,
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 07:43:25 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
i don't understand why the program crashes when i do not do
the .dup
This is weird. I would say it should not crash
exactely. but try it yourself.
the fastest version i could come up so far is below.
std.conv slows it down.
going f
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 07:19:43 +
"yawniek" wrote:
> hi,
>
> unpacking files is kinda slow, probably i'm doing something wrong.
>
> below code is about half the speed of gnu zcat on my os x machine.
> why?
>
> why do i need to .dup the buffer?
It depends. In your case you don't need to.
by
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 07:36:39 +
"yawniek" wrote:
> On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 07:29:15 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
> > Which compiler and version. There has been some performance
> > problem with IO on OSX, it should be fixed in 2.068 release
>
> i'm on master. v2.068-devel-8f81ffc
> also cha
On Friday, 7 August 2015 at 07:29:15 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
Which compiler and version. There has been some performance
problem with IO on OSX, it should be fixed in 2.068 release
i'm on master. v2.068-devel-8f81ffc
also changed file read mode to "rb".
i don't understand why the program cras
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 07:19:43 +
yawniek via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> hi,
>
> unpacking files is kinda slow, probably i'm doing something wrong.
>
> below code is about half the speed of gnu zcat on my os x machine.
> why?
>
> why do i need to .dup the buffer?
> can i get rid of the cas
17 matches
Mail list logo
