On Thursday, 20 September 2012 at 18:31:38 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2012-09-20 13:14, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, September 20, 2012 12:34:50 Johannes Pfau wrote:
But it should be possible.
I'm not arguing that it shouldn't be possible. I'm just
pointing out that it
wouldn't
On 2012-09-20 01:56, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Yes. But the solution then is to not unit test your library that way. You
build it as a binary with an empty main and run that. It may be that compiling
it as a library and then linking should work, but unless you want to have the
unit test stuff
Am Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:34:18 -0700
schrieb Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com:
On Wednesday, September 19, 2012 20:50:08 Chris Molozian wrote:
Hey all,
I'm sure that this is a rather daft question but I've tried to
search the d.learn mailing list and must have missed a question
On Thursday, September 20, 2012 12:34:50 Johannes Pfau wrote:
But it should be possible.
I'm not arguing that it shouldn't be possible. I'm just pointing out that it
wouldn't really be useful. You have to build at least two versions of your
library anyway (one with -unittest and one without),
On 2012-09-20 13:14, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, September 20, 2012 12:34:50 Johannes Pfau wrote:
But it should be possible.
I'm not arguing that it shouldn't be possible. I'm just pointing out that it
wouldn't really be useful. You have to build at least two versions of your
library
Hey all,
I'm sure that this is a rather daft question but I've tried to
search the d.learn mailing list and must have missed a question
about it.
I've read the unit testing documentation on dlang.org and I know
that `unittest { /* some code */ }` blocks are compiled into the
executable and
Actually after more digging it seems that unit testing libraries
in D doesn't work.
It seems pretty bad that in 2012 with unit testing a huge part of
the software development process and D describing itself as a
language with unit testing built in, this bug report / feature
request hasn't
On Wednesday, September 19, 2012 20:50:08 Chris Molozian wrote:
Hey all,
I'm sure that this is a rather daft question but I've tried to
search the d.learn mailing list and must have missed a question
about it.
I've read the unit testing documentation on dlang.org and I know
that
On 2012-09-19 21:34, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
You don't build it as a library when your unit testing it. You create an empty
main, compile it all as an executable, and run it. I believe that rdmd --main
will do this for you (rdmd comes with dmd), but I haven't really used rdmd, so
I'm not 100%
On Wednesday, September 19, 2012 21:49:19 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-09-19 21:34, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
You don't build it as a library when your unit testing it. You create an
empty main, compile it all as an executable, and run it. I believe that
rdmd --main will do this for you
On Wednesday, 19 September 2012 at 18:49:12 UTC, Chris Molozian
wrote:
Hey all,
I'm sure that this is a rather daft question but I've tried to
search the d.learn mailing list and must have missed a question
about it.
I've read the unit testing documentation on dlang.org and I
know that
11 matches
Mail list logo
