On 01/25/2012 06:35 AM, Mars wrote:
I have a few classes which I want to implement as singletons (like
configuration, database connection, etc.), because I have to access them
throughout my whole program, and from different threads.
You haven't asked, so I shouldn't be commenting on your
On Thursday, 26 January 2012 at 19:13:11 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
You haven't asked, so I shouldn't be commenting on your design,
but singleton is accepted as an anti-pattern for a long time
now. It is more like a solution in search of a problem. For
example, in your case, you can solve your
Hello everybody.
I have a few classes which I want to implement as singletons
(like configuration, database connection, etc.), because I have
to access them throughout my whole program, and from different
threads. I'm implementing the singletons like this:
Alternative approach, I just found:
http://pastie.org/private/1jlcvfostnbopfp3quflg
If I get that right, this is basically the classic singleton,
like it would be in other languages, right?
So... what's the best way?
Mars
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:50:57 -0500, Mars -@-.- wrote:
Alternative approach, I just found:
http://pastie.org/private/1jlcvfostnbopfp3quflg
If I get that right, this is basically the classic singleton, like it
would be in other languages, right?
So... what's the best way?
This is an ok
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:50:57 -0500, Mars -@-.- wrote:
Alternative approach, I just found:
http://pastie.org/private/1jlcvfostnbopfp3quflg
If I get that right, this is basically the classic singleton, like it
