On Saturday, 29 September 2012 at 23:02:08 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 09/30/2012 12:51 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Disclaimer: I assume that D's rules are the same as C and C++
here.
C and C++ do not have struct literals and if I am not mistaken,
constructor invocation is a sequence point.
S(4,
On 09/29/2012 08:13 PM, ixid wrote:
> On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 00:24:34 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> On 09/29/2012 04:02 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> > On 09/30/2012 12:51 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> >> On 09/29/2012 11:16 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> >> > On 09/29/2012 06:26 PM, Maxim Fomin wrote:
>>
On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 00:24:34 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 09/29/2012 04:02 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 09/30/2012 12:51 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> On 09/29/2012 11:16 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> > On 09/29/2012 06:26 PM, Maxim Fomin wrote:
>>
>> >>> S s = S(1,2,3);
>> >>> s = S(4, s.a, 6);
>
On 09/29/2012 04:02 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 09/30/2012 12:51 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> On 09/29/2012 11:16 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> > On 09/29/2012 06:26 PM, Maxim Fomin wrote:
>>
>> >>> S s = S(1,2,3);
>> >>> s = S(4, s.a, 6);
>> >>>
>> >>> assert(a == [4,1,6]);
>> >>> assert(s == S(4,4,6));
>
On 09/30/2012 12:51 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 09/29/2012 11:16 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 09/29/2012 06:26 PM, Maxim Fomin wrote:
>>> S s = S(1,2,3);
>>> s = S(4, s.a, 6);
>>>
>>> assert(a == [4,1,6]);
>>> assert(s == S(4,4,6));
>>> }
>>>
>>> Setting the struct writes s.a before evaluat
On 09/29/2012 11:16 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 09/29/2012 06:26 PM, Maxim Fomin wrote:
>>> S s = S(1,2,3);
>>> s = S(4, s.a, 6);
>>>
>>> assert(a == [4,1,6]);
>>> assert(s == S(4,4,6));
>>> }
>>>
>>> Setting the struct writes s.a before evaluating it while the reverse
>>> is true of the array ass
On Saturday, 29 September 2012 at 18:16:24 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
This seems to be a DMD bug.
And a pretty serious looking one at that. That bug could make
nukes fly to wrong coordinates, and that just ruins everybody's
day.
On 09/29/2012 06:26 PM, Maxim Fomin wrote:
On Saturday, 29 September 2012 at 16:05:03 UTC, ixid wrote:
This behaviour seems inconsistent and unintuitive:
void main() {
int[3] a = [1,2,3];
a = [4, a[0], 6];
struct S {
int a, b, c;
}
S s = S(1,2,3);
s = S(4, s.a,
On Saturday, 29 September 2012 at 16:05:03 UTC, ixid wrote:
This behaviour seems inconsistent and unintuitive:
void main() {
int[3] a = [1,2,3];
a = [4, a[0], 6];
struct S {
int a, b, c;
}
S s = S(1,2,3);
s = S(4, s.a, 6);
This behaviour seems inconsistent and unintuitive:
void main() {
int[3] a = [1,2,3];
a = [4, a[0], 6];
struct S {
int a, b, c;
}
S s = S(1,2,3);
s = S(4, s.a, 6);
assert(a == [4,1,6]);
assert(s == S(4,4,6));
}
Set
10 matches
Mail list logo
