On Monday, 1 August 2016 at 16:05:51 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 8/1/16 12:01 PM, Patric wrote:
I expected nothing to happen because "ref" its a simple
pointer, right?
Or I am missing something here?
You want opAssign, not opOpAssign. opOpAssign is for things
like +=.
Your code h
On Monday, 1 August 2016 at 16:21:16 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Monday, 1 August 2016 at 16:18:32 UTC, Patric wrote:
But still.
If it was the case of "+=" wasn´t wrong to call the dtor since
is a ref var?
No. It was working as expected. You never implemented opAssign,
so default assignment
On Monday, 1 August 2016 at 16:18:32 UTC, Patric wrote:
But still.
If it was the case of "+=" wasn´t wrong to call the dtor since
is a ref var?
No. It was working as expected. You never implemented opAssign,
so default assignment was being used. There was no ref variable.
On Monday, 1 August 2016 at 16:17:02 UTC, Patric wrote:
On Monday, 1 August 2016 at 16:05:51 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 8/1/16 12:01 PM, Patric wrote:
I expected nothing to happen because "ref" its a simple
pointer, right?
Or I am missing something here?
You want opAssign, not opO
On Monday, 1 August 2016 at 16:14:31 UTC, Patric wrote:
On Monday, 1 August 2016 at 16:05:51 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 8/1/16 12:01 PM, Patric wrote:
I expected nothing to happen because "ref" its a simple
pointer, right?
Or I am missing something here?
You want opAssign, not opO
On Monday, 1 August 2016 at 16:05:51 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 8/1/16 12:01 PM, Patric wrote:
I expected nothing to happen because "ref" its a simple
pointer, right?
Or I am missing something here?
You want opAssign, not opOpAssign. opOpAssign is for things
like +=.
Your code h
On Monday, 1 August 2016 at 16:05:51 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 8/1/16 12:01 PM, Patric wrote:
I expected nothing to happen because "ref" its a simple
pointer, right?
Or I am missing something here?
You want opAssign, not opOpAssign. opOpAssign is for things
like +=.
Your code h
On 8/1/16 12:01 PM, Patric wrote:
I expected nothing to happen because "ref" its a simple pointer, right?
Or I am missing something here?
You want opAssign, not opOpAssign. opOpAssign is for things like +=.
Your code had me worried for a while :)
-Steve
struct Test{
int x;
this(int v){
x = v;
writeln(x.to!string ~ " Created");
}
~this(){
writeln(x.to!string ~ " Destroyed");
}
void opOpAssign(string op, Type)(ref Type s){
x = s.x;
