On Sunday, 9 May 2021 at 22:55:41 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
Check the assembly
I already did, here's the "wrong" version when I only run `$ dmd
-betterC -m64 test.d`:
```
Dump of file test.obj
main:
pushrbp
mov rbp,rsp
mov rax,qword ptr gs:[58h]
mov
On Sunday, 9 May 2021 at 21:42:54 UTC, Blatnik wrote:
On Sunday, 9 May 2021 at 20:56:01 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
This is a long shot, but are you on OSX? I think TLS is
handled specially for 32-bit OSX and that may somehow work in
this case. (?)
Nope, I'm on (64bit) windows.
Another really
On Sunday, 9 May 2021 at 20:56:01 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
This is a long shot, but are you on OSX? I think TLS is handled
specially for 32-bit OSX and that may somehow work in this
case. (?)
Nope, I'm on (64bit) windows.
Another really weird thing is that if I compile this code in
VisualD
On 5/9/21 11:49 AM, Blatnik wrote:
Also, why did it work for 32-bits then?
This is a long shot, but are you on OSX? I think TLS is handled
specially for 32-bit OSX and that may somehow work in this case. (?)
Ali
On Sunday, 9 May 2021 at 18:46:18 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
No.
It is tied to druntime. I.e. on Linux it calls __tls_get_addr
to get the address.
Oh. I wish I got a warning about that from the compiler then >.>
Also, why did it work for 32-bits then?
On 10/05/2021 6:41 AM, Blatnik wrote:
Do thread local variables work in -betterC? Or maybe it's better to ask
are they _supposed_ to work in -betterC?
No.
It is tied to druntime. I.e. on Linux it calls __tls_get_addr to get the
address.
Do thread local variables work in -betterC? Or maybe it's better
to ask are they _supposed_ to work in -betterC?
Here's a simple test program:
```D
// test.d
auto a;
extern(C) void main() {
printf("before... ");
a = 42;
printf("after");
}
import core.stdc.
On Sunday, 9 May 2021 at 18:41:33 UTC, Blatnik wrote:
Here's a simple test program:
Whoops, `auto a` should be `int a`. Habits :P
