On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Jarrett Billingsley
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:15 PM, grauzone wrote:
>> If he had to use OS specific APIs (which would be another sad thing about
>> Tango), I'd suggest to use clock_gettime() with CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID
>> under Unix.
>>
>> What is timex?
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:15 PM, grauzone wrote:
> If he had to use OS specific APIs (which would be another sad thing about
> Tango), I'd suggest to use clock_gettime() with CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID
> under Unix.
>
> What is timex?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timex_(Unix)
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Matthias Walter
wrote:
Hi there,
I'd like to time some functions using Tango, but only including the really used
CPU-time. StopWatch and the other time functions I've found don't mind on the
CPU usage, which means if I time multiple
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Matthias Walter
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'd like to time some functions using Tango, but only including the really
> used CPU-time. StopWatch and the other time functions I've found don't mind
> on the CPU usage, which means if I time multiple processes at once whi
Hi there,
I'd like to time some functions using Tango, but only including the really used
CPU-time. StopWatch and the other time functions I've found don't mind on the
CPU usage, which means if I time multiple processes at once which share a
single CPU, their times increase...
Best regards
Mat
