ixid:
This is not OK:
int fun5(int n) {
int fun6(int n) {
return n + 1;
}
return n.fun6;
}
Unfortunately this is by design, and at the moment it's unlikely
to change. And I think it's done this way to avoid troubles with
code in class methods.
Bye,
Why does UFCS seem to require that functions be defined in a
higher (global being the highest) scope than themselves while the
normal function syntax works fine?
This is OK:
int fun1(int n) {
return n + 1;
}
int fun2(int n) {
return n.fun1;
}
This is also OK:
int fun3(int n) {
