On Thursday, 8 September 2016 at 13:38:54 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
There is a workaround, identified by Vladimir Panteleev
(https://blog.thecybershadow.net/2015/04/28/the-amazing-template-that-does-nothing/):
import std.algorithm;
bool fulfillsKeyPredicate(string s, string t)
On 9/7/16 4:26 AM, Andre Pany wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 September 2016 at 08:08:34 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 07/09/2016 8:06 PM, Andre Pany wrote:
Should I open an enhancement request?
No.
It works outside of the function (part of lookup rules).
I simplified my example too much. Yes in
On Wednesday, 7 September 2016 at 08:35:26 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 07/09/2016 8:26 PM, Andre Pany wrote:
[...]
People have tried, this is the behavior as designed.
The workaround is simple, don't use UFCS.
I won't repeat the explanation or reasoning here, plenty of
posts on it ;)
On 07/09/2016 8:26 PM, Andre Pany wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 September 2016 at 08:08:34 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 07/09/2016 8:06 PM, Andre Pany wrote:
Should I open an enhancement request?
No.
It works outside of the function (part of lookup rules).
I simplified my example too much.
On Wednesday, 7 September 2016 at 08:08:34 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 07/09/2016 8:06 PM, Andre Pany wrote:
Should I open an enhancement request?
No.
It works outside of the function (part of lookup rules).
I simplified my example too much. Yes in the example above I can
move the
On 07/09/2016 8:06 PM, Andre Pany wrote:
Should I open an enhancement request?
No.
It works outside of the function (part of lookup rules).
Hi,
I just noticed ufcs does not work with alias. Is this limitation
needed?
void foo(int a) {}
void main()
{
alias bar = foo;
3.foo();
3.bar();
}
Last line fails with "no property 'bar' for type int.
Should I open an enhancement request?
Kind regards
André
