On 2013-08-29, 10:25, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, August 29, 2013 10:07:31 Paul Jurczak wrote:
On Thursday, 29 August 2013 at 07:51:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
[..]
> as any integral value in a float will fit in an
> int.
[..]
Will it? Most of them will not fit
Sure, they will
On Thursday, 29 August 2013 at 08:58:02 UTC, Paul Jurczak wrote:
On Thursday, 29 August 2013 at 08:26:11 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, August 29, 2013 10:07:31 Paul Jurczak wrote:
On Thursday, 29 August 2013 at 07:51:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
[..]
> as any integral value in a
On Thursday, 29 August 2013 at 08:26:11 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, August 29, 2013 10:07:31 Paul Jurczak wrote:
On Thursday, 29 August 2013 at 07:51:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
[..]
> as any integral value in a float will fit in an
> int.
[..]
Will it? Most of them will not
On Thursday, 29 August 2013 at 08:26:11 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, August 29, 2013 10:07:31 Paul Jurczak wrote:
On Thursday, 29 August 2013 at 07:51:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
[..]
> as any integral value in a float will fit in an
> int.
[..]
Will it? Most of them will not
On Thursday, August 29, 2013 10:07:31 Paul Jurczak wrote:
> On Thursday, 29 August 2013 at 07:51:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
> wrote:
> [..]
>
> > as any integral value in a float will fit in an
> > int.
>
> [..]
>
> Will it? Most of them will not fit
Sure, they will. float has 32 bits, just like
On Thursday, 29 August 2013 at 07:51:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
[..]
as any integral value in a float will fit in an
int.
[..]
Will it? Most of them will not fit, but cast to int produces
nonsensical value anyway as in this example:
cast(int)float.max
With to!int you get a proper warn
On Thursday, August 29, 2013 08:50:47 Paul Jurczak wrote:
> On Thursday, 29 August 2013 at 06:23:18 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 29, 2013 07:47:16 Paul Jurczak wrote:
> >> I'm writing this rather ugly:
> >>
> >> sqrt(cast(float)D) != round(sqrt(cast(float)D)
> >>
> >>
On Thursday, 29 August 2013 at 06:23:18 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, August 29, 2013 07:47:16 Paul Jurczak wrote:
I'm writing this rather ugly:
sqrt(cast(float)D) != round(sqrt(cast(float)D)
line and I'm looking for more concise notation without
introducing a meaningless variable
On Thursday, August 29, 2013 07:47:16 Paul Jurczak wrote:
> I'm writing this rather ugly:
>
> sqrt(cast(float)D) != round(sqrt(cast(float)D)
>
> line and I'm looking for more concise notation without
> introducing a meaningless variable to hold expression being
> tested. Is there an equivalent of
On Thursday, 29 August 2013 at 05:47:43 UTC, Paul Jurczak wrote:
I'm writing this rather ugly:
sqrt(cast(float)D) != round(sqrt(cast(float)D)
line and I'm looking for more concise notation without
introducing a meaningless variable to hold expression being
tested. Is there an equivalent of st
I'm writing this rather ugly:
sqrt(cast(float)D) != round(sqrt(cast(float)D)
line and I'm looking for more concise notation without
introducing a meaningless variable to hold expression being
tested. Is there an equivalent of std.math.trunc(), which would
return fractional portion instead, ma
11 matches
Mail list logo
