On Saturday, 31 July 2021 at 13:59:46 UTC, Tejas wrote:
On Saturday, 31 July 2021 at 13:57:40 UTC, kinke wrote:
This is possible via:
```
__dtor();
super.__dtor();
```
WHOO YEAH!!!
THANK YOU SO MUCH :D
Heh you're welcome. Note that you'll probably want `__xdtor()`,
which also destructs
On Saturday, 31 July 2021 at 13:57:40 UTC, kinke wrote:
This is possible via:
```
__dtor();
super.__dtor();
```
WHOO YEAH!!!
THANK YOU SO MUCH :D
This is possible via:
```
__dtor();
super.__dtor();
```
On Saturday, 31 July 2021 at 13:34:25 UTC, user1234 wrote:
On Saturday, 31 July 2021 at 13:12:21 UTC, Tejas wrote:
```d
class A{
~this(){}
destructA(){
~this()
}
}
class B:A{
~this(){}
destructB(){
~this();
~super();
}
}
```
This could allow
On Saturday, 31 July 2021 at 13:34:25 UTC, user1234 wrote:
On Saturday, 31 July 2021 at 13:12:21 UTC, Tejas wrote:
```d
class A{
~this(){}
destructA(){
~this()
}
}
class B:A{
~this(){}
destructB(){
~this();
~super();
}
}
```
This could allow
On Saturday, 31 July 2021 at 13:12:21 UTC, Tejas wrote:
```d
class A{
~this(){}
destructA(){
~this()
}
}
class B:A{
~this(){}
destructB(){
~this();
~super();
}
}
```
This could allow ```@nogc``` crowd to run destructors without
calling
```d
class A{
~this(){}
destructA(){
~this()
}
}
class B:A{
~this(){}
destructB(){
~this();
~super();
}
}
```
This could allow ```@nogc``` crowd to run destructors without
calling ```destroy```.
Yes, derived to base conversion is still a thing and
