On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 20:16:31 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 20:09:57 UTC, Martin Drašar
wrote:
Those two immutables are not redundant, because it is an array
of immutable chars (string), that is itself immutable.
It is redundant because "immutable" is transitiv
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 20:09:57 UTC, Martin Drašar wrote:
Those two immutables are not redundant, because it is an array
of immutable chars (string), that is itself immutable.
It is redundant because "immutable" is transitive. "immutable
char[]" is equivalent.
But Tango has lot of m
Dne 12.11.2013 19:49, Nicolas Sicard napsal(a):
In this declaration (tango.io.Console.d from Tango2):
__gshared immutable immutable(char)[] Eol = "\r\n";
Aren't the two `immutable` keywords redundant? Why would `__gshared` be
necessary for such an immutable type?
Thanks
Hi,
this declaration
In this declaration (tango.io.Console.d from Tango2):
__gshared immutable immutable(char)[] Eol = "\r\n";
Aren't the two `immutable` keywords redundant? Why would
`__gshared` be necessary for such an immutable type?
Thanks
