On Thursday, 5 August 2021 at 15:23:24 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
As I understand it, @property is discouraged by the community.
That's what I say here:
http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/property.html#ix_property.@property
I knew I have read it somewhere ... thanks for the clarification
Ali !
On 8/4/21 7:21 PM, someone wrote:
> somewhere I read
> Ali saying there's nothing wrong implementing properties the old-way via
> functions because @property has nothing special about it but I can't
> state where I read what I am stating so take it with a grain of salt.
As I understand it, @prop
On Thursday, 5 August 2021 at 01:47:36 UTC, Alexandru Ermicioi
wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 22:28:53 UTC, someone wrote:
Is that what you mean ?
Not really. I was assuming you were talking about @property
methods, and if so you could declare such cases:
```
interface HasMutableLstr
On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 22:28:53 UTC, someone wrote:
Is that what you mean ?
Not really. I was assuming you were talking about @property
methods, and if so you could declare such cases:
```
interface HasMutableLstrSymbolId {
@property lstrSymbolId();
@property lstrSymbolId(string id
On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 22:22:29 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 22:01:21 UTC, someone wrote:
No. I didn't know it ever existed :(
It is good to look at the source code implementations of some
of those things too. Most are built out of language features
and som
On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 16:41:04 UTC, Alexandru Ermicioi
wrote:
Since you're using classes consider just declaring an interface
that denotes that implementor has this field, it would be much
easier to check for it, and easier for compiler since it avoids
compile time magic.
I am not
On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 22:01:21 UTC, someone wrote:
No. I didn't know it ever existed :(
It is good to look at the source code implementations of some of
those things too. Most are built out of language features and
some of it is simpler to use directly (and some of it are pretty
tri
On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 16:41:04 UTC, Alexandru Ermicioi
wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 15:08:24 UTC, someone wrote:
However, __traits(hasMember, ...) checks for the existence of
anything labeled lstrCurrencyID within the class (eg:
unrelated variables with same name; not gonna h
On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 20:13:53 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 8/4/21 11:08 AM, someone wrote:
Have you looked at
[std.traits](https://dlang.org/phobos/std_traits.html) at all?
It does a lot of stuff, including giving you parameter names
and types.
No. I didn't know it ever exi
On 8/4/21 11:08 AM, someone wrote:
However, __traits(hasMember, ...) checks for the existence of anything
labeled lstrCurrencyID within the class (eg: unrelated variables with
same name; not gonna happen, but, I like to code it the right way); so,
question is: is there any way to search the pa
On Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 15:08:24 UTC, someone wrote:
However, __traits(hasMember, ...) checks for the existence of
anything labeled lstrCurrencyID within the class (eg: unrelated
variables with same name; not gonna happen, but, I like to code
it the right way); so, question is: is there
I have the following chunk of code that needs to conditionally
instantiate existing classes (at compilation time) named
classTickerCustom{ExchangeID} with one or ... two parameters (if
any); eg:
```d
/// securities trading on exchange primary currency; eg: USD
... = new classTickerCustomNYSE(
12 matches
Mail list logo
