On Monday, 23 August 2021 at 14:49:17 UTC, jfondren wrote:
On Monday, 23 August 2021 at 14:04:05 UTC, Brian Tiffin wrote:
That's the goal. It's an optional goal at this point. I'm
not *really* worried about size of object code, yet, but
figured this would be a neat way to shrink the compiled
On Monday, 23 August 2021 at 14:04:05 UTC, Brian Tiffin wrote:
That's the goal. It's an optional goal at this point. I'm not
*really* worried about size of object code, yet, but figured
this would be a neat way to shrink the compiled code generated
from some large COBOL source fragments embed
On Monday, 23 August 2021 at 11:53:46 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 23.08.21 08:14, Brian Tiffin wrote:
From ~~a~~ little reading, it seems associative array literal
initialization is still pending for global scope, but allowed
in a module constructor? *If I understood the skimming
surface reading
On 23.08.21 08:14, Brian Tiffin wrote:
From ~~a~~ little reading, it seems associative array literal
initialization is still pending for global scope, but allowed in a
module constructor? *If I understood the skimming surface reading so far*.
```d
immutable string[string] things;
static (thi
From ~~a~~ little reading, it seems associative array literal
initialization is still pending for global scope, but allowed in
a module constructor? *If I understood the skimming surface
reading so far*.
```d
immutable string[string] things;
static (this) {
things = ["key1": "value 1", "ke
