On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 18:36:00 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:
Funniest thing happen in cases like this when he reports the
bug himself and soon fixes it, later bug is hit by someone else
but during reporting it is realized that bug is already fixed,
pull is pushed to master and everyone
Am 14.10.2013 13:35, schrieb Jack Applegame:
Why this doesn't compile?
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/21ef5b04
class Foo {}
struct Bar1 {
const(Foo[]) member;
}
struct Bar2 {
const Foo member;
}
void main() {
const Bar1 bar1;
const Bar2 bar2;
Bar1 b1 = bar1; // ok
Bar2
Why this doesn't compile?
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/21ef5b04
class Foo {}
struct Bar1 {
const(Foo[]) member;
}
struct Bar2 {
const Foo member;
}
void main() {
const Bar1 bar1;
const Bar2 bar2;
Bar1 b1 = bar1; // ok
Bar2 b2 = bar2; // cannot
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 11:38:23 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
The line Bar2 b2 = bar2; would remove const from member
Seems strange, because b2.member is const by declaration.
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 11:45:30 UTC, Jack Applegame wrote:
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 11:38:23 UTC, Benjamin Thaut
wrote:
The line Bar2 b2 = bar2; would remove const from member
Seems strange, because b2.member is const by declaration.
Strange indeed and smells like a bug. `auto
Am 14.10.2013 13:54, schrieb Dicebot:
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 11:45:30 UTC, Jack Applegame wrote:
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 11:38:23 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
The line Bar2 b2 = bar2; would remove const from member
Seems strange, because b2.member is const by declaration.
Strange
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 11:35:32 UTC, Jack Applegame wrote:
Why this doesn't compile?
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/21ef5b04
class Foo {}
struct Bar1 {
const(Foo[]) member;
}
struct Bar2 {
const Foo member;
}
void main() {
const Bar1 bar1;
const Bar2
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 13:56:58 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Am 14.10.2013 13:54, schrieb Dicebot:
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 11:45:30 UTC, Jack Applegame
wrote:
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 11:38:23 UTC, Benjamin Thaut
wrote:
The line Bar2 b2 = bar2; would remove const from member
Am 14.10.2013 16:19, schrieb Maxim Fomin:
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 13:56:58 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Am 14.10.2013 13:54, schrieb Dicebot:
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 11:45:30 UTC, Jack Applegame wrote:
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 11:38:23 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
The line Bar2
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 14:18:10 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 11:35:32 UTC, Jack Applegame
wrote:
Why this doesn't compile?
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/21ef5b04
class Foo {}
struct Bar1 {
const(Foo[]) member;
}
struct Bar2 {
const Foo member;
On 10/14/2013 10:33 AM, Kenji Hara wrote:
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 14:18:10 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:
This is compilable using git head.
When I read that line ...
Kenji Hara
... I was thinking about that person. :)
Thank you Kenji!
Ali
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 17:38:22 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 10/14/2013 10:33 AM, Kenji Hara wrote:
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 14:18:10 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:
This is compilable using git head.
When I read that line ...
Kenji Hara
... I was thinking about that person. :)
Thank
12 matches
Mail list logo