On Tuesday, 6 March 2012 at 07:29:54 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Actually the -lib switch might be the answer to one of the
incremental compilation problems DMD suffers from. That DMD
usually does not output all symbols to all object files which
can result in missing symbols when doing
On 2012-03-06 08:56, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 08:29:53 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-03-06 02:21, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 01:53:02 Zach the Mystic wrote:
Reading the documentation about compiler options and flags here:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 11:31:40 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-03-06 08:56, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 08:29:53 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-03-06 02:21, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 01:53:02 Zach the Mystic wrote:
Reading the
On 2012-03-07 01:47, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 11:31:40 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-03-06 08:56, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 08:29:53 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-03-06 02:21, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 01:53:02 Zach
I'm not sure if the linker errors I'm getting are my fault or D's.
I'm trying to do incremental compilation since the size of my
program is starting to break my computer, slowing compilations
down by four or five times.
Suppose I have two libraries:
lib1.a
lib2.a
I build lib1 with a bunch of
Reading the documentation about compiler options and flags here:
http://dlang.org/dmd-osx.html
led me to believe that building libraries was the right way to do
incremental compilation. But I thought, well, can I just build
file1.o object files instead?
So I've started doing that and I've
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 01:53:02 Zach the Mystic wrote:
Reading the documentation about compiler options and flags here:
http://dlang.org/dmd-osx.html
led me to believe that building libraries was the right way to do
incremental compilation. But I thought, well, can I just build
file1.o
Libraries are not intented for incremental compilation. They
are for
distributing code in a unit which can be used by programs. And
in the case of
a shared library, it gives the added benefit of reducing the
amount of
duplicate code you get in binaries (saving both memory and disk
space).
If
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 05:26:34 Zach the Mystic wrote:
Libraries are not intented for incremental compilation. They
are for
distributing code in a unit which can be used by programs. And
in the case of
a shared library, it gives the added benefit of reducing the
amount of
On 2012-03-06 02:21, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 01:53:02 Zach the Mystic wrote:
Reading the documentation about compiler options and flags here:
http://dlang.org/dmd-osx.html
led me to believe that building libraries was the right way to do
incremental compilation. But
On 2012-03-06 01:04, Zach the Mystic wrote:
I'm not sure if the linker errors I'm getting are my fault or D's.
I'm trying to do incremental compilation since the size of my
program is starting to break my computer, slowing compilations
down by four or five times.
I just want to give you a
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 08:29:53 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-03-06 02:21, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 01:53:02 Zach the Mystic wrote:
Reading the documentation about compiler options and flags here:
http://dlang.org/dmd-osx.html
led me to believe that
12 matches
Mail list logo
