On Thursday, 29 March 2018 at 09:16:11 UTC, dangbinghoo wrote:
On Thursday, 29 March 2018 at 09:13:27 UTC, dangbinghoo wrote:
On Thursday, 29 March 2018 at 09:02:16 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
On Thursday, 29 March 2018 at 08:47:50 UTC, dangbinghoo wrote:
[...]
try
[...]
thanks for
On Thursday, 29 March 2018 at 09:13:27 UTC, dangbinghoo wrote:
On Thursday, 29 March 2018 at 09:02:16 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
On Thursday, 29 March 2018 at 08:47:50 UTC, dangbinghoo wrote:
[...]
try
[...]
thanks for your reply, but it will also fail, the compiler just
gives me :
On Thursday, 29 March 2018 at 09:02:16 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Thursday, 29 March 2018 at 08:47:50 UTC, dangbinghoo wrote:
* #define SPI_MSGSIZE(N) \
N)*(sizeof (struct spi_ioc_transfer))) < (1 <<
_IOC_SIZEBITS)) \
? ((N)*(sizeof (struct spi_ioc_transfer))) : 0)
On Thursday, 29 March 2018 at 08:47:50 UTC, dangbinghoo wrote:
* #define SPI_MSGSIZE(N) \
N)*(sizeof (struct spi_ioc_transfer))) < (1 <<
_IOC_SIZEBITS)) \
? ((N)*(sizeof (struct spi_ioc_transfer))) : 0)
*/
extern (D) size_t SPI_MSGSIZE(size_t N)
{
return ((N *
On Thursday, 29 March 2018 at 08:47:50 UTC, dangbinghoo wrote:
hi,
I'm doing a D binding myself to , and has
some problems to wrap the C macros.
[...]
PS: if I just _IOW!(char[])... it compiles, but does it mean it's
unsafe? thanks!
hi,
I'm doing a D binding myself to , and has
some problems to wrap the C macros.
```
import core.sys.posix.sys.ioctl;
...
/* IOCTL commands */
enum SPI_IOC_MAGIC = 'k';
/**
* Orginal C macros.
*
* #define SPI_MSGSIZE(N) \
N)*(sizeof (struct spi_ioc_transfer))) < (1 <<
