On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 22:14:56 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 21:50:30 UTC, Assembly wrote:
class Baa {
Foo a = new Foo();
Foo b = new Foo();
Foo[] l = [a,b];
I wasn't aware about this. I'm used to have static only when I
request so, like using static keyword
On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 21:50:30 UTC, Assembly wrote:
class Baa {
Foo a = new Foo();
Foo b = new Foo();
Foo[] l = [a,b];
Keep in mind that those instances are *static* and probably not
what you expect; modifying a will be seen across all instances of
Baa unless you actually assign
Imaginary code:
class Foo { }
class Baa {
Foo a = new Foo();
Foo b = new Foo();
Foo[] l = [a,b];
}
What should I use instead of to it work? Array!Foo(a,b) didn't
worked either.
I know this works:
class Baa {
Foo a = new Foo();
Foo b = new Foo();
Foo[] l;
this() {
l = [a,b];
}
