On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 15:57:16 UTC, anonymous wrote:
`zmod.symbol` works, too.
no, it's not. at least on latest GDC.
I don't think so. The point of the renamed import is that you
have to use the new name.
but i renamed only my.module, not others. nothing hints me that
renaming is SO
ketmar:
so it's broken beyond any repair. so sad.
The current implementation of the module system has some
problems, that are being worked on. If you think some part of the
module system design is not good enough, then try to ask for an
enhancement :-) No need to be sad.
Bye,
bearophile
On 04/29/14 11:57, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 15:57:16 UTC, anonymous wrote:
`zmod.symbol` works, too.
no, it's not. at least on latest GDC.
It certainly works here; if it didn't it would be a frontend problem.
I don't think so. The point of the renamed
Artur Skawina:
The D module system has a lot of problems and certainly needs
to be completely redesigned from scratch,
I don't think it will be redesigned from scratch (and if that
happens I see no proof that the redesign will be better than the
original design). So better to fix its major
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 09:57:08 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 15:57:16 UTC, anonymous wrote:
`zmod.symbol` works, too.
no, it's not. at least on latest GDC.
Works for me with Ubuntu's gdc 4.8.2-1ubuntu6. My little test
case:
my/module_.d:
---
module my.module_;
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 10:57:13 UTC, Artur Skawina via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
The D module system has a lot of problems and certainly needs
to be completely redesigned from scratch
i don't see any real flaws in it. it's just little
inconsistencies that can be easily fixed.
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 10:44:44 UTC, bearophile wrote:
The current implementation of the module system has some
problems, that are being worked on. If you think some part of
the module system design is not good enough, then try to ask
for an enhancement :-) No need to be sad.
ah, i can't
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 11:10:06 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Works for me with Ubuntu's gdc 4.8.2-1ubuntu6.
ah, don't you believe that i *really tested* it before posting,
with latest GDC from git (which i builds routinely on dayly
basis)?
Personally, I think the current behaviour is fine.
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 11:10:06 UTC, anonymous wrote:
specifically, it was derelict sdl bindings. that module itself
does public imports, so issue is more complicated. sorry for me
being rude.
ketmar:
ah, i can't clearly express myself even in this case, i don't
think i can make clear request. it's easier to write code, not
words. ;-)
i'm sad not about D or module issues, i'm sad about myself.
One of the most important skills of a programmer (and of course a
technical/literary
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 11:23:56 UTC, ketmar wrote:
ah, don't you believe that i *really tested* it before posting,
with latest GDC from git (which i builds routinely on dayly
basis)?
You may have made mistakes when testing, or maybe I have. That's
why I provided my testcase. Does it
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 11:28:23 UTC, bearophile wrote:
One of the most important skills of a programmer (and of course
a technical/literary writer) is the ability to express ideas in
written text.
the thing is that English neither my native language nor i
learned it in school (not really
ketmar:
the thing is that English neither my native language
Nor mine, as you can see :-) And I am bad with natural languages
in general. But you can learn to write acceptable English if
you do exercises for some years :-)
Bye,
bearophile
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 11:47:07 UTC, anonymous wrote:
You may have made mistakes when testing, or maybe I have.
sorry again for being rude. i was really upset and
unintentionally made it to you.
That's why I provided my testcase. Does it work in your setup?
your sample is ok. but
On 4/29/2014 8:25 PM, ketmar wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 11:10:06 UTC, anonymous wrote:
specifically, it was derelict sdl bindings. that module itself does
public imports, so issue is more complicated. sorry for me being rude.
What, exactly, is the problem you are having with public
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 13:53:58 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
What, exactly, is the problem you are having with public
imports in Derelict?
it's not derelict issue, sorry is i made you to think that. issue
is with the renamed public imports, and dereclit was one that
triggered it. nothing bad
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 13:53:58 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
ah. besides that i was once unable to build derelict sdl due to
undefined symbols like 'ipad' or so, can't really remember. but
it's the thing you got when goind bleeding edge, i think.
fuck. nobody approves my posts in mailing list. if i want to spam
this forum — i can do it here. shit.
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 21:21:10 UTC, ketmar wrote:
bye. will never write here again.
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 00:52:50 UTC, ketmar wrote:
module my.module;
public import other.module;
…
module mainprogram;
import my.module;
now i can access other.module symbols without qualifiers
and another case:
module mainprogram;
import zmod = my.module;
now i CAN'T access
i wrote a module which public imports other modules (to avoid
importing 'em by hand, 'cause import lists depends on version()).
then i imported this 'main' module with renaming: import zmod =
my.module;
now i can't acces any identifiers from modules that my.module
public imports and i forced
21 matches
Mail list logo
