Re: new(malloc) locks everything in multithreading

2014-10-24 Thread tcak via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 03:42:29 UTC, safety0ff wrote: On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 02:51:20 UTC, tcak wrote: I don't want to blame dmd directly because as far as I see from the search I did with __lll_lock_wait_private, some C++ programs are having same problem with malloc operation

Re: new(malloc) locks everything in multithreading

2014-10-24 Thread Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-learn
If it's deterministic, looks more like https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4890 (11981 is not deterministic)

Re: new(malloc) locks everything in multithreading

2014-10-24 Thread tcak via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 08:47:55 UTC, Kagamin wrote: If it's deterministic, looks more like https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4890 (11981 is not deterministic) Yes, it is deterministic. Run it as many times as you want, and it does the same thing. I ran it now again, and still

Re: new(malloc) locks everything in multithreading

2014-10-24 Thread Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-learn
Do you see recursive call to malloc in the stack trace?

Re: new(malloc) locks everything in multithreading

2014-10-24 Thread tcak via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 08:55:17 UTC, Kagamin wrote: Do you see recursive call to malloc in the stack trace? I further simplified the example: import std.stdio; import core.thread; class ThreadTest{ public this(){ new core.thread.Thread( threadRun ).start();

Re: new(malloc) locks everything in multithreading

2014-10-24 Thread tcak via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 09:12:57 UTC, tcak wrote: On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 08:55:17 UTC, Kagamin wrote: Do you see recursive call to malloc in the stack trace? I further simplified the example: import std.stdio; import core.thread; class ThreadTest{ public this(){

Re: new(malloc) locks everything in multithreading

2014-10-24 Thread Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-learn
Looks like your IDE filters too much. Can you configure it to filter less and show address locations?

Re: new(malloc) locks everything in multithreading

2014-10-24 Thread tcak via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 10:46:57 UTC, tcak wrote: On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 10:29:10 UTC, Kagamin wrote: Looks like your IDE filters too much. Can you configure it to filter less and show address locations? This is what I have found: Main Thread http://i.imgur.com/6ElZ3Fm.png

Re: new(malloc) locks everything in multithreading

2014-10-24 Thread tcak via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 10:29:10 UTC, Kagamin wrote: Looks like your IDE filters too much. Can you configure it to filter less and show address locations? This is what I have found: Main Thread http://i.imgur.com/6ElZ3Fm.png Second Thread (TestThread) http://i.imgur.com/w4y5gYB.png

Re: new(malloc) locks everything in multithreading

2014-10-24 Thread Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 10:46:57 UTC, tcak wrote: Second Thread (TestThread) http://i.imgur.com/w4y5gYB.png Hmm... where is __lll_lock_wait_private now? And how mmap can hang at all?

Re: new(malloc) locks everything in multithreading

2014-10-24 Thread Kapps via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 10:49:42 UTC, tcak wrote: On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 10:46:57 UTC, tcak wrote: On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 10:29:10 UTC, Kagamin wrote: Looks like your IDE filters too much. Can you configure it to filter less and show address locations? This is what I have

Re: new(malloc) locks everything in multithreading

2014-10-24 Thread tcak via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 12:38:48 UTC, Kagamin wrote: On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 10:46:57 UTC, tcak wrote: Second Thread (TestThread) http://i.imgur.com/w4y5gYB.png Hmm... where is __lll_lock_wait_private now? And how mmap can hang at all? Here it is. http://i.imgur.com/5ZDuYRF.png

Re: new(malloc) locks everything in multithreading

2014-10-24 Thread tcak via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 16:51:02 UTC, Kapps wrote: On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 10:49:42 UTC, tcak wrote: Not sure if this is the same issue, but by default gdb breaks on signals that the GC uses, which would explain why it's breaking in gdb but not normally. What happens if you try:

Re: new(malloc) locks everything in multithreading

2014-10-24 Thread Kapps via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 18:38:39 UTC, tcak wrote: On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 16:51:02 UTC, Kapps wrote: On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 10:49:42 UTC, tcak wrote: Not sure if this is the same issue, but by default gdb breaks on signals that the GC uses, which would explain why it's

Re: new(malloc) locks everything in multithreading

2014-10-24 Thread Sean Kelly via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 21:02:05 UTC, Kapps wrote: Yes, GDB is stopping on SIGUSR1 / SIGUSR2 since that's the default settings. D's GC uses these signals for suspending / resuming threads during a collection. You need to type what I said above, prior to typing 'run'. I took a look at

Re: new(malloc) locks everything in multithreading

2014-10-24 Thread tcak via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 21:02:05 UTC, Kapps wrote: On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 18:38:39 UTC, tcak wrote: On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 16:51:02 UTC, Kapps wrote: This is what I did on shell: (I put some spaces for readability) tolga@tolga:~/dev/d/bug$ dmd -gc -debug test.d

new(malloc) locks everything in multithreading

2014-10-23 Thread tcak via Digitalmars-d-learn
This must be my special day that everything I try gets broken. import core.thread; import std.stdio; class ThreadTest{ private core.thread.Thread th; public this() shared{ th = cast( shared )( new core.thread.Thread(

Re: new(malloc) locks everything in multithreading

2014-10-23 Thread safety0ff via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 02:51:20 UTC, tcak wrote: I don't want to blame dmd directly because as far as I see from the search I did with __lll_lock_wait_private, some C++ programs are having same problem with malloc operation as well. But still, can this be because of compiler? Looks