On Thursday, 6 January 2022 at 16:01:40 UTC, HuskyNator wrote:
On Thursday, 6 January 2022 at 13:33:24 UTC, bauss wrote:
While not the exact same, there's a small work around here
that can help in some cases:
```d
immutable long[string] aa;
shared static this() {
aa = [
"foo": 5,
On Thursday, 6 January 2022 at 16:01:09 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Thursday, 6 January 2022 at 12:04:12 UTC, HuskyNator wrote:
On Monday, 28 November 2016 at 14:41:44 UTC, Era Scarecrow
wrote:
On Monday, 28 November 2016 at 09:06:34 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
The point is that I was trying
On Thursday, 6 January 2022 at 13:33:24 UTC, bauss wrote:
While not the exact same, there's a small work around here that
can help in some cases:
```d
immutable long[string] aa;
shared static this() {
aa = [
"foo": 5,
"bar": 10,
"baz": 2000
];
}
```
Thanks a lot!
On Thursday, 6 January 2022 at 12:04:12 UTC, HuskyNator wrote:
On Monday, 28 November 2016 at 14:41:44 UTC, Era Scarecrow
wrote:
On Monday, 28 November 2016 at 09:06:34 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
The point is that I was trying to avoid some cycle between
modules, detected by 2.072. This bug
On Thursday, 6 January 2022 at 12:04:12 UTC, HuskyNator wrote:
On Monday, 28 November 2016 at 14:41:44 UTC, Era Scarecrow
wrote:
On Monday, 28 November 2016 at 09:06:34 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
The point is that I was trying to avoid some cycle between
modules, detected by 2.072. This bug
On Monday, 28 November 2016 at 14:41:44 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
On Monday, 28 November 2016 at 09:06:34 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
The point is that I was trying to avoid some cycle between
modules, detected by 2.072. This bug leads to pollution in the
use of static this only to workaround
On Monday, 28 November 2016 at 09:06:34 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
The point is that I was trying to avoid some cycle between
modules, detected by 2.072. This bug leads to pollution in the
use of static this only to workaround the limitation...
Wasn't someone working on a Associative Array
On Sunday, 27 November 2016 at 22:25:51 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Saturday, 26 November 2016 at 17:37:57 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
This is stated in documentation [1]:
immutable long[string] aa = [
"foo": 5,
"bar": 10,
"baz": 2000
];
unittest
{
assert(aa["foo"] == 5);
On Saturday, 26 November 2016 at 17:37:57 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
This is stated in documentation [1]:
immutable long[string] aa = [
"foo": 5,
"bar": 10,
"baz": 2000
];
unittest
{
assert(aa["foo"] == 5);
assert(aa["bar"] == 10);
assert(aa["baz"] == 2000);
}
But results
On Saturday, 26 November 2016 at 19:57:21 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Saturday, 26 November 2016 at 17:37:57 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
This is stated in documentation [1]:
What's the link?
This is a known limitation, it has never worked. The docs
should reflect that, though some day, it
On Saturday, 26 November 2016 at 17:37:57 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
This is stated in documentation [1]:
What's the link?
This is a known limitation, it has never worked. The docs should
reflect that, though some day, it might start working.
This is stated in documentation [1]:
immutable long[string] aa = [
"foo": 5,
"bar": 10,
"baz": 2000
];
unittest
{
assert(aa["foo"] == 5);
assert(aa["bar"] == 10);
assert(aa["baz"] == 2000);
}
But results to:
Error: non-constant expression ["foo":5L, "bar":10L,
12 matches
Mail list logo
