On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 18:51:15 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:59:28 +
John Colvin via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
Can someone explain why this can't/doesn't work? Thanks.
hm. why it should? there is no 'default' constructors in D, and
you
specifia
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:59:28 +
John Colvin via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Can someone explain why this can't/doesn't work? Thanks.
hm. why it should? there is no 'default' constructors in D, and you
specifially made explicit one private (i.e. not visible outside the
module). and adding const
On 4/29/14, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> The fact that call to base constructor is not inserted into
> templated this()() looks like a bug to me.
Just found this, and it might be related:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5770
http://dlang.org/class.html#constructors
"If no call to constructors via this or super appear in a
constructor, and the base class has a constructor, a call to
super() is inserted at the beginning of the constructor."
The fact that call to base constructor is not inserted into
templated this
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 13:59:30 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
//blah1.d
class A
{
private this(){}
}
//blah2.d
import blah1;
class B : A {}
$ dmd blah1.d blah2.d -lib
Error: constructor blah1.A.this is not accessible from module
blah2
Can someone explain why this can't/doesn't work?
//blah1.d
class A
{
private this(){}
}
//blah2.d
import blah1;
class B : A {}
$ dmd blah1.d blah2.d -lib
Error: constructor blah1.A.this is not accessible from module
blah2
Can someone explain why this can't/doesn't work? Thanks.
