On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 00:18:41 timotheecour wrote:
> Can we replace phobos' and tools' Makefile with D with following
> advantages:
>
> * no more 3 distinct files (posix.mak,win32.mak,win64.mak),
> instead use version() to maximize code reuse.
>
> * less verbosity / bugs / forward compatib
Can we replace phobos' and tools' Makefile with D with following
advantages:
* no more 3 distinct files (posix.mak,win32.mak,win64.mak),
instead use version() to maximize code reuse.
* less verbosity / bugs / forward compatibility issues eg when a
module is added/renamed: eg could take advan