Well. I just try it again and I noticed this things :
-Changind the lambda function from :
auto caca2 = map!((a) {return a * iDeltaT;})(caca);
to :
auto caca2 = map!((a) {return a + iDeltaT;})(caca);
Avoid the segmentation fault
-Using dmd 2.60 avoid the segmentation fault.
The source code
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 18:21:48 UTC, Zardoz wrote:
I'm trying to use Map with a code like this :
...
immutable int m = 10;
int[] caca = [1,2,3,4];
auto caca2 = map!( (a) {return a * m;})(caca);
writeln(caca2);
...
I get a Segmentation fault some times:
The most interesting poi
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 07:21:47PM +0100, Zardoz wrote:
> I'm trying to use Map with a code like this :
>
> ...
> immutable int m = 10;
> int[] caca = [1,2,3,4];
>
> auto caca2 = map!( (a) {return a * m;})(caca);
>
> writeln(caca2);
> ...
>
> I get a Segmentation fault some times:
> The
On 2012-12-10 19:21, Zardoz wrote:
I'm trying to use Map with a code like this :
...
immutable int m = 10;
int[] caca = [1,2,3,4];
auto caca2 = map!( (a) {return a * m;})(caca);
writeln(caca2);
...
I get a Segmentation fault some times:
The most interesting point it's that depends
I'm trying to use Map with a code like this :
...
immutable int m = 10;
int[] caca = [1,2,3,4];
auto caca2 = map!( (a) {return a * m;})(caca);
writeln(caca2);
...
I get a Segmentation fault some times:
The most interesting point it's that depends of the code around
of it ins the same
