Hello Saaa,
BCS,
I'll keep to that convention in my next posts.
thanks
BCS,
Thanks for pointing that out.
I'll keep to that convention in my next posts.
Could you /please/ include the "reply to" line in the text of your posts.
Most clients seem to add it by default and it makes it much easier for people
to find replies to there posts. (I have a filter set up to mark post with
my username so, in my case I'd guess that without that line, I'm about
Ah, slicing, of course, thanks!
> Hello Saaa,
>
>> I understand a bitarray being faster than a boolean array as the first
>> uses
>> bitwise (hardware) operators.
>> Is this a correct understanding of the situation?
>> Why then is a boolean array not implemented in that way?
>
> Because you can'
Hello Saaa,
I understand a bitarray being faster than a boolean array as the first
uses
bitwise (hardware) operators.
Is this a correct understanding of the situation?
Why then is a boolean array not implemented in that way?
Because you can't slice a bit array the same way you can slice a int
I understand a bitarray being faster than a boolean array as the first uses
bitwise (hardware) operators.
Is this a correct understanding of the situation?
Why then is a boolean array not implemented in that way?
I expect there to be a good reason which I just don't know.
I'd like to be able to b