On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:29:28 +, Jack Applegame wrote:
why std.conv.to is not pure?
string foo(real v) pure { return v.to!string; }
// Error: pure function 'foo' cannot call impure function
'std.conv.to!string.to!(real).to'
'cause float-string conversion is damned hard task. to perform
why std.conv.to is not pure?
string foo(real v) pure { return v.to!string; }
// Error: pure function 'foo' cannot call impure function
'std.conv.to!string.to!(real).to'
On Saturday, 14 February 2015 at 12:24:51 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:29:28 +, Jack Applegame wrote:
why std.conv.to is not pure?
string foo(real v) pure { return v.to!string; }
// Error: pure function 'foo' cannot call impure function
'std.conv.to!string.to!(real).to'
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 19:59:58 +, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Saturday, 14 February 2015 at 12:24:51 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:29:28 +, Jack Applegame wrote:
why std.conv.to is not pure?
string foo(real v) pure { return v.to!string; }
// Error: pure function 'foo'
While snprintf might be one thing that provides to be an interesting
obstacle, the better answer to why std.conv.to isnt pure is that no one
has invested the time to work through issues like that to make it so.
It _should_ be pure.
On 2/14/2015 12:32 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
