I was pretty happy to find that I could use mu and sigma when
writing statistical routines, but I've found that for more
obscure non-ascii characters the support is hit or miss. For
example, none of the subscripts are valid characters, but I can
use superscript n as well as dot-notation for
On Sunday, 1 June 2014 at 22:26:42 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
I was pretty happy to find that I could use mu and sigma when
writing statistical routines, but I've found that for more
obscure non-ascii characters the support is hit or miss. For
example, none of the subscripts are valid
With unicode support (especially with UCFS) I can really code
more in the way I think. I never gave it much thought until I
worked with D, but now that I have I feel it is a bit weird to
work with epsilons and deltas on paper and eps and del or
something on the screen. And what's a more
Ah!, found it in utf.h as ALPHA_TABLE
