On Friday, 22 June 2018 at 20:20:56 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 6/22/18 2:25 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 06/22/2018 08:17 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> reason to use functors
I wonder whether they are more efficient because a functor
would carry just the state that it needs. Also,
On 6/22/18 2:25 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 06/22/2018 08:17 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> reason to use functors
I wonder whether they are more efficient because a functor would carry
just the state that it needs. Also, there is no GC memory allocation
unless the programmer wants to.
I
On Friday, June 22, 2018 14:06:06 Flaze07 via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> recently, I visited the glossary and saw that functor exist in
> D...I know that functor exist C++ as a way to easily allow higher
> order function, but since D already has function and delegates,
> is there a point to
On 06/22/2018 08:17 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> reason to use functors
I wonder whether they are more efficient because a functor would carry
just the state that it needs. Also, there is no GC memory allocation
unless the programmer wants to.
I wonder how much state is allocated for a
On Friday, 22 June 2018 at 14:06:06 UTC, Flaze07 wrote:
recently, I visited the glossary and saw that functor exist in
D...I know that functor exist C++ as a way to easily allow
higher order function, but since D already has function and
delegates, is there a point to functor ?
It there for
On 6/22/18 10:06 AM, Flaze07 wrote:
recently, I visited the glossary and saw that functor exist in D...I
know that functor exist C++ as a way to easily allow higher order
function, but since D already has function and delegates, is there a
point to functor ?
D covers a lot of programming
recently, I visited the glossary and saw that functor exist in
D...I know that functor exist C++ as a way to easily allow higher
order function, but since D already has function and delegates,
is there a point to functor ?
