%u wrote:
== Quote from Don (nos...@nospam.com)'s article
%u wrote:
Should I post it as a bug, even though I have no code to accompany it?
I have no clue as to where to start my directed search for a minimal case.
Can you post the entire source code?
It's important that it be reproducible. It
== Quote from Don (nos...@nospam.com)'s article
> It's in a switch statement somewhere.
> It sounds as though this is a bug which involves multiple files, so
> it'll be difficult to reduce it.
> If you're able to compile DMD, change this line in statement.c line 2620:
> Statement *SwitchStatement::
%u wrote:
== Quote from Don (nos...@nospam.com)'s article
It's in a switch statement somewhere.
It sounds as though this is a bug which involves multiple files, so
it'll be difficult to reduce it.
If you're able to compile DMD, change this line in statement.c line 2620:
Statement *SwitchStatemen
On 1/13/11, Don wrote:
> The DMD makefile compiles in debug mode by default. It prints some
> useless 'fixups' junk. You need to compile with make -fwin32.mak release
> or make -flinux.mak release
> to make a release compiler.
Ugh, I just realized I was using DMD in debug mode by mistake for the
== Quote from Don (nos...@nospam.com)'s article
> > Yay for first time compiling dmd :)
> Sorry you had to do that!
Had to learn that once anyway :)
Maybe I'll even be able to take a stab at fixing bugs someday..
== Quote from Simen kjaeraas (simen.kja...@gmail.com)'s article
> %u wrote:
> > I only need something to make a void deleg() from a void func().
> This works for me:
> ReturnType!( F ) delegate( ParameterTypeTuple!( F ) ) toDelegate( F )( F
> fn ) {
> return ( ParameterTypeTuple!( F ) args ){
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 19:29:30 -0500, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011 15:29:51 %u wrote:
Sorry to bump this up, but is RefCounted(T) really leaking, or am I
missing
something? I would like to use this in my program, and I'm curious as to
why no one responded, since if
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
> But even so, malloc and free have the same property where they don't
> always give back memory to the OS. IIUC, Linux can only change the size
> of memory it wants, it cannot free pages in the middle of the block.
>
> -Steve
Disclaimer: I don't know what I am t
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:40:04 -0500, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
But even so, malloc and free have the same property where they don't
always give back memory to the OS. IIUC, Linux can only change the size
of memory it wants, it cannot free pages in the middle of the b
Thanks very nice info, just two guys babbling about things they've only read I
guess, but you seem much better informed.
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
> I think all memory is allocated/deallocated from the OS via the sbrk/brk
> system call:
>
>
> brk() and sbrk() change the locati
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:14:13 +, %u wrote:
> == Quote from Simen kjaeraas (simen.kja...@gmail.com)'s article
>> %u wrote:
>> > I only need something to make a void deleg() from a void func().
>> This works for me:
>> ReturnType!( F ) delegate( ParameterTypeTuple!( F ) ) toDelegate( F )(
>> F f
11 matches
Mail list logo
