Is there some option, similar to -E gcc option, that would
generate the analogous listing for D? What I mean is that I'd
like to see all the code in version blocks gone, all the mixin
strings expanded.
It is probably too much to wish for having the infered auto's
expanded...
On 15.03.2012 12:35, Jay Norwood wrote:
Is there some option, similar to -E gcc option, that would generate the
analogous listing for D? What I mean is that I'd like to see all the
code in version blocks gone, all the mixin strings expanded.
It is probably too much to wish for having the infered
On 14/03/12 18:46, Boscop wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 March 2012 at 17:35:06 UTC, Don Clugston wrote:
In the last bit of code, why not use CTFE for valid(string s) instead
of templates?
bool valid(string s)
{
foreach(c; s)
{
if (c < 'w' || c > 'z') return false;
}
return true;
}
In fact you can us
On 2012-03-15 09:35, Jay Norwood wrote:
Is there some option, similar to -E gcc option, that would generate the
analogous listing for D? What I mean is that I'd like to see all the
code in version blocks gone, all the mixin strings expanded.
It is probably too much to wish for having the infered
On 2012-03-15 11:04, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-03-15 09:35, Jay Norwood wrote:
Is there some option, similar to -E gcc option, that would generate the
analogous listing for D? What I mean is that I'd like to see all the
code in version blocks gone, all the mixin strings expanded.
It is prob
On Thursday, March 15, 2012 09:35:46 Jay Norwood wrote:
> Is there some option, similar to -E gcc option, that would
> generate the analogous listing for D? What I mean is that I'd
> like to see all the code in version blocks gone, all the mixin
> strings expanded.
>
> It is probably too much to
On Thursday, 15 March 2012 at 10:09:25 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
The Eclipse plugin, Descent, has a view that does something
like this.
Although I don't know how well it works for D2.
It expands mixins, string mixins, replaces scope statements
with try/catch/finally and other things. It als
On Thursday, 15 March 2012 at 08:35:48 UTC, Jay Norwood wrote:
Is there some option, similar to -E gcc option, that would
generate the analogous listing for D?
You could add one to the compiler in just
a few lines; there's already a function that
does it, but it isn't called from anywhere.
Ope
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 02:51:33PM +0100, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 March 2012 at 08:35:48 UTC, Jay Norwood wrote:
> >Is there some option, similar to -E gcc option, that would
> >generate the analogous listing for D?
>
> You could add one to the compiler in just
> a few lines; there'
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:34:19 +0100, Jay Norwood wrote:
I also found mention of a c++ compiler that someone states can compile
c++ and output C. Kind of weird, but maybe compiling D to expanded D
would not be such a stretch.
That's how early C++ compilers worked. Actually, many compilers w
On 2012-03-15 14:34, Jay Norwood wrote:
On Thursday, 15 March 2012 at 10:09:25 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
The Eclipse plugin, Descent, has a view that does something like this.
Although I don't know how well it works for D2.
It expands mixins, string mixins, replaces scope statements with
try
There's a pull request to help with debugging string mixins:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/426
Thanks for the suggestions, I updated the article with an
improved CTFE version at the end.
Yes, this is a lot more clear, thanks.
On Thursday, 15 March 2012 at 05:06:16 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On 3/15/2012 12:26 PM, Chris Pons wrote:
I haven't used DLL's much, especially one I've built on my
own, so
guidance would be appreciated.
I'm trying to figure out how to build a DLL which wa
I'm trying to submit a pull request for druntime, but I'm running into a
git problem. This is what I did:
- (I forgot that my master branch is out of date)
- created a new branch for the fix and committed some changes
- switched to master and ran 'git pull'
- now master is ahead of the branch by a
On 15-03-2012 20:13, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I'm trying to submit a pull request for druntime, but I'm running into a
git problem. This is what I did:
- (I forgot that my master branch is out of date)
- created a new branch for the fix and committed some changes
- switched to master and ran 'git pull'
Ok, I've actually run into another problem. I've decided to use a
static library, since my project is small. I have added the path
to the static library's .lib file in my project properties, just
like with derelict2. However, I'm not sure how to use import
properly.
The library in question is
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:59:57PM +0100, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> On 15-03-2012 20:13, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >I'm trying to submit a pull request for druntime, but I'm running into a
> >git problem. This is what I did:
> >
> >- (I forgot that my master branch is out of date)
> >- created a new b
On 15-03-2012 21:49, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:59:57PM +0100, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 15-03-2012 20:13, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I'm trying to submit a pull request for druntime, but I'm running into a
git problem. This is what I did:
- (I forgot that my master branch is out
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:49:14 -0700
"H. S. Teoh" wrote:
> Another question. How to I repair my current history, which is all
> messed up now?
By not using DVCS which allows you to rewrite history (hint: check
Fossil). ;)
Otoh, I do not know how much you are 'in love' wiht git, but maybe it
woul
On 15-03-2012 21:53, Gour wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:49:14 -0700
"H. S. Teoh" wrote:
Another question. How to I repair my current history, which is all
messed up now?
By not using DVCS which allows you to rewrite history (hint: check
Fossil). ;)
It's perfectly useful in DVCS. Without it
On 3/15/2012 3:56 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 15-03-2012 21:53, Gour wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:49:14 -0700
"H. S. Teoh" wrote:
Another question. How to I repair my current history, which is all
messed up now?
By not using DVCS which allows you to rewrite history (hint: check
Fossil
On Thursday, March 15, 2012 16:17:50 Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
> On 3/15/2012 3:56 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> > On 15-03-2012 21:53, Gour wrote:
> >> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:49:14 -0700
> >>
> >> "H. S. Teoh" wrote:
> >>> Another question. How to I repair my current history, which is all
> >>> me
On 15-03-2012 22:17, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
On 3/15/2012 3:56 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 15-03-2012 21:53, Gour wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:49:14 -0700
"H. S. Teoh" wrote:
Another question. How to I repair my current history, which is all
messed up now?
By not using DVCS which allow
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:51:30PM +0100, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> On 15-03-2012 21:49, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
> >Another question. How to I repair my current history, which is all
> >messed up now? That is, my branch has a whole bunch of commits I didn't
> >make; how do I clean it up? Or is i
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:16:45PM +0100, Chris Pons wrote:
> Ok, I've actually run into another problem. I've decided to use a
> static library, since my project is small. I have added the path to
> the static library's .lib file in my project properties, just like
> with derelict2. However, I'm n
On 15-03-2012 22:37, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:51:30PM +0100, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 15-03-2012 21:49, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
Another question. How to I repair my current history, which is all
messed up now? That is, my branch has a whole bunch of commits I didn't
ma
Yes thank you. That cleared this up.
On Thursday, 15 March 2012 at 22:08:18 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:16:45PM +0100, Chris Pons wrote:
Ok, I've actually run into another problem. I've decided to
use a
static library, since my project is small. I have added the
path to
t
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:12:26PM +0100, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> On 15-03-2012 22:37, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
> >I did discover an interesting thing about git though... at one point
> >in the cleanup process I accidentally reset 1 more commit than I had
> >intended, and that commit had no oth
On 3/15/12, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> It's correct, albeit a bit ugly. To alleviate the ugliness, you can tell
> the compiler where the "root" directory for the library is supposed to
> be. For example, if you invoked dmd with -ILibraries/Math, then you'll
> be able to say:
>
> import math.matrix;
You could have a look at my attempt:
https://github.com/DannyArends/D-coding/tree/master/src/web
I've been playing around with VS Macros trying to step away from
explicit declarations of library locations. I'm using a google
repository as I would like to be able to work on projects either
at my desktop or laptop without having to worry about specific
library path locations.
I tried using
"H. S. Teoh" wrote in message
news:mailman.719.1331847338.4860.digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com...
> Actually, I discovered that my origin/master branch was also broken
> (probably due to running the wrong git command in it in the past),
> because it had a bunch of commits from upstream that fo
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 01:43:52PM +1100, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> "H. S. Teoh" wrote in message
> news:mailman.719.1331847338.4860.digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com...
>
> > Actually, I discovered that my origin/master branch was also broken
> > (probably due to running the wrong git command in i
Hello,
Does anyone know why I would get different results between
ctRegex and regex in the following snippet?
Thanks,
Josh
---
#!/usr/local/bin/rdmd
import std.stdio, std.regex;
void main() {
string strcmd = "./myApp.rb -os OSX -path \"/GIT/Ruby
Apps/sec\" -conf 'no timer'";
auto ctre
On 16 March 2012 16:35, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> [...]
>> I used to have this problem all the time - now I have a script which
>> checks out master and pulls with -ff-only (in all three repositories)
>> giving me a nice big error if I accidentally committed to master.
>> Although I think I just lost it
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 04:52:35PM +1300, James Miller wrote:
[...]
> Generally I find that pulls should be rebased, ff-only, and local
> merges done with --no-ff. This means that you have merge history in
> the tree, which can be useful when trying to do code archaeology, and
> pulls are forced to
On 16 March 2012 17:09, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> Generally I find that pulls should be rebased, ff-only, and local
>> merges done with --no-ff. This means that you have merge history in
>> the tree, which can be useful when trying to do code archaeology, and
>> pulls are forced to be merged properly,
38 matches
Mail list logo
