Good I know I spotted something _real_ this time!
On Wednesday, 27 June 2012 at 11:55:11 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 06/27/2012 01:24 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 06/27/2012 11:07 AM, Michael wrote:
Hello all,
I came across some weird behaviors yesterday and I can't
figure out
what it's about.
On Wednesday, 27 June 2012 at 23:50:17 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 06/27/2012 04:05 PM, Adam Burton wrote:
>> For example I would like to
>> have a thread calculate the sum of the first half of an array
>> while another thread would calculate the other half, and I
could
>> add the two results at
yeah, I didn't knew std.parallelism was so easy to use. Speed up was
really big for minimal effort.
On 06/26/2012 12:41 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I want to red flag this code for another reason.
You must *never* access GC-allocated references in a destructor, to do
so will make the program crash randomly.
The docs should be so assertive (not that I read them or anything).
The destr
Am 27.06.2012 14:25, schrieb Steven Schveighoffer:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 05:37:00 -0400, Minas Mina
wrote:
How can I do that?
Why not list.remove(x); like in STL?
SList is quite unusable.
If you are looking for STL-like containers, there is dcollections which
has a doubly-linked list, and su
I'm fine that the assignment to C is verboten. I'd disallow
the
first assignments to and would like to know, why they are kept.
OK, now I get it. I'm not sure why they're allowed, either; I
guess that it's just because it's written with assignment syntax.
On second thought, it might be f
On Monday, June 25, 2012 22:06:20 Tobias Pankrath wrote:
> -
> struct A { bool a; alias a this; }
> struct B { int b; alias b this; }
>
> A a = false; // works
> B b = 12; // works
>
> struct C
> {
> A aa;
> B ab;
> }
>
> C c = { false, 12 }; // does not work, because the implicit
> conv
I'm fine that the assignment to C is verboten. I'd disallow
the
first assignments to and would like to know, why they are kept.
OK, now I get it. I'm not sure why they're allowed, either; I
guess that it's just because it's written with assignment syntax.
On second thought, it might be f
