Well, how you can reduce the long ugly name in this case? In the
real function I mentioned it so many times.
void foo( S s )
{
auto local = this.bigUglyName;
auto b = s.bigUglyName;
writeln( bigUglyName (AKA local)=, local, b=, b );
}
:P
On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 10:17:01 UTC, Namespace wrote:
void foo( S s )
{
auto local = this.bigUglyName;
auto b = s.bigUglyName;
writeln( bigUglyName (AKA local)=, local, b=, b );
}
:P
By the way, yes. Thanks for that, I'm stupid today.
On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 10:07:49 UTC, mimi wrote:
Well, how you can reduce the long ugly name in this case? In
the real function I mentioned it so many times.
By not making the name ugly big.
On 05/26/2013 05:59 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 05/26/2013 05:38 AM, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
Tuple!(size_t, size_t)[][] data = createData();
immutable dataImm = assumeUnique(data);
data = null; // Simply to ensure no mutable references exist.
The last line is not needed.
I'm trying to accept delegates or functions in a templated method.
My first try using isDelegate!dg || isFunctionPointer!dg did
not work because isDelegate fails, although I'm not sure I
understand exactly why:
void main()
{
int x;
static assert(isDelegate!(() { x =
On 05/27/2013 07:05 AM, Luís Marques luismarq...@gmail.com wrote:
If I changed that example to use isSomeFunction it works correctly. But
when I tried to use isSomeFunction in the proper context it fails to
compile:
It is a red herring. The code fails to compile even without isSomeFunction.
Do you know if it's OK to accept x3 assignment and refuse the a2
assignment?
struct Foo {
immutable(char)[4] bar;
}
Foo x1 = { AA };// No error.
immutable(char)[4] a1 = AA; // No error.
void main() {
Foo x2 = { AA };// No error.
Foo x3 = Foo(AA); // No
On Saturday, 25 May 2013 at 21:19:30 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Is there any examples of using inotify with D?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inotify
I've updated the old tango header file and tried to get
something working but it seems to hang. If anyone else has code
using inotify i'd love
This is quite an open ended question but i wondered how you guys
debug your D programs (i'm talking about stepping through code,
setting breakpoints, etc). The lack of nice IDE's with integrated
debuggers is worrying when working with D but up until now i
haven't need one.
Now i've started
On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 19:55:57 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
This is quite an open ended question but i wondered how you
guys debug your D programs (i'm talking about stepping through
code, setting breakpoints, etc). The lack of nice IDE's with
integrated debuggers is worrying when working
On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 11:32:46 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:
On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 10:07:49 UTC, mimi wrote:
Well, how you can reduce the long ugly name in this case? In
the real function I mentioned it so many times.
By not making the name ugly big.
Other people do.
In addition,
On Mon, 27 May 2013 14:08:12 +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
On 05/26/2013 05:59 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 05/26/2013 05:38 AM, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
Tuple!(size_t, size_t)[][] data = createData();
immutable dataImm = assumeUnique(data);
On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 18:00:38 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Do you know if it's OK to accept x3 assignment and refuse the
a2 assignment?
struct Foo {
immutable(char)[4] bar;
}
Foo x1 = { AA };// No error.
immutable(char)[4] a1 = AA; // No error.
void main() {
Foo x2 = { AA
Hello, I'm trying to get back into D again. This time around, I'm
playing mostly with concurency and parallism, all the while
trying to get my code writen in the D way as much as possible.
I've run into a rather major road block that seems rather
nonsensical at face value, so I'm not sure if i'm
Kenji Hara:
Thank you very much for your gentle and useful answers :-)
struct Foo {
immutable(char)[4] bar;
}
Foo x1 = { AA };// No error.
immutable(char)[4] a1 = AA; // No error.
void main() {
Foo x2 = { AA };// No error.
Foo x3 = Foo(AA); // No error.
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 00:24:32 UTC, Francois Chabot wrote:
Hello, I'm trying to get back into D again. This time around,
I'm
playing mostly with concurency and parallism, all the while
trying to get my code writen in the D way as much as possible.
I've run into a rather major road block
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 00:35:32 UTC, Diggory wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 00:24:32 UTC, Francois Chabot wrote:
Hello, I'm trying to get back into D again. This time around,
I'm
playing mostly with concurency and parallism, all the while
trying to get my code writen in the D way as
On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 19:55:57 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Now i've started to write much larger programs, i'm wondering
which debuggers do you use? Especially using Linux.
I just use gdb with dmd's -gc -debug flags, when I use a debugger
at all. tbh I kinda prefer just littering
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 00:29:04 UTC, bearophile wrote:
std.typecons.Tuple supports structural assignment before the
change.
The code also works with 2.062.
I know it's not a regression. But you say:
Named-field tuple should be a subtype of unnamed-field tuple.
You can have sub-typing, or
On 05/27/2013 11:33 PM, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
A few questions:
Why use a class? Will MyDataStore be subclassed?
It was important to me that it have reference semantics, in particular that a =
b implies a is b.
Will you have some instances of MyDataStore that will be mutated, and
others
21 matches
Mail list logo
