On Thursday, 17 April 2014 at 21:27:44 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:04:25 -0400, monarch_dodra
monarchdo...@gmail.com wrote:
void[] will only make sense once you've accepted that
void.sizeof == 1.
It is already accepted that when we talk about length in a
void[],
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 02:04:16 -0400, monarch_dodra monarchdo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thursday, 17 April 2014 at 21:27:44 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:04:25 -0400, monarch_dodra
monarchdo...@gmail.com wrote:
void[] will only make sense once you've accepted that
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 00:05:03 -0400, Kagamin s...@here.lot wrote:
Well, it's proof of concept of bound checked variable-size struct, I
wrote it in a minute. It even compiles and runs.
Please take no offense :) I just was pointing out a difference between a
hand-managed and hand-written
On Friday, 18 April 2014 at 13:08:04 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I admit, I didn't think C's void had a size ;) I'm pretty sure
it doesn't in D, but then again...
-Steve
Yeah... static assert(void.sizeof == 1); passes :/
So in any case, long story short:
void[]: This is an un-typed
Oh, and I don't believe, that a variable-size struct can be
emplaced inside fixed-size struct or class. Only as a smart
pointer from the example.
I mean, it doesn't cover all scenarios, but can be extended to
support them. The indexes array does just that: it's emplaced
without indirection, but still is bound checked.
On Friday, 18 April 2014 at 13:10:28 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Note, you could probably, with mixin magic, make a version that
could be emplaced inside a struct or class without an extra
indirection.
Speaking about mixin magic, you probably suggest to do it overly
generically, though
Could someone please give some references to thorough explainings
on these latest concurrency mechanisms
- Go: Goroutines
- Coroutines (Boost):
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coroutine
-
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_55_0/libs/coroutine/doc/html/coroutine/intro.html
- D:
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 12:59:35 -0400, Kagamin s...@here.lot wrote:
Oh, and I don't believe, that a variable-size struct can be emplaced
inside fixed-size struct or class. Only as a smart pointer from the
example.
It goes at the end. Then you need to allocate the whole thing with that in
Correction: The references I gave _are_ theoretically thorough,
so I'm satisified with these for now. I'm however still
interested in the D-specific questions I asked.
Hi there,
I try to remove all equal elements of an array, thus [2,2] -- [2].
I thought this maybe would be possible with std.algorithm.reduce, but at
least the way I tried it doesn't work:
arr.reduce( (a,b) = a != b );
Is there a simple solution using Phobos-functions?
Thank you,
Tim
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:46:25 -0400, Tim Holzschuh via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
Hi there,
I try to remove all equal elements of an array, thus [2,2] -- [2].
I thought this maybe would be possible with std.algorithm.reduce, but at
least the way I tried it
On Friday, 18 April 2014 at 20:27:20 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Note also that what it returns is not an array, but a lazily
iterated range over the array. If you want another array, this
is the code I would use:
arr.sort();
arr = arr.uniq.array();
-Steve
Out of curiosity, if the
monarch_dodra:
Out of curiosity, if the requirement was to *also* preserve
ordering (eg: remove all non-first elements), how would you go
at it?
[2, 1, 1, 3, 2, 3] = [2, 1, 3];
Maybe std.algorithm's `makeIndex` would help here?
Bonus points for doing it inplace.
This preserves ordering
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
inta0[];
inta1[][];
string a2[][];
string a3[][string];
string a4[][string][string];
//string a4[string][string][string]; is this the same as above
inta5[][string][string][string];
inta6[string][int][string][float];
int
On Saturday, 19 April 2014 at 00:27:32 UTC, steven kladitis wrote:
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
inta0[];
inta1[][];
string a2[][];
string a3[][string];
string a4[][string][string];
//string a4[string][string][string]; is this the same as
above
int
Thanks, I am trying to understand what I am doing. The docs seem
unclear to me on how to initialize these. I think there are
three ways.
with brackets , the other with foreach or direct assignments.
-- here is a longer version
-- uncomment out the assignments to see the errors I get.
-- I am
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
inta0[];
inta1[][];
string a2[][];
string a3[][string];
string a4[][string][string];
//string a4[string][string][string]; is this the same as above
inta5[][string][string][string];
inta6[string][int][string][float];
int
18 matches
Mail list logo