On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 09:47:56 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 09:24:52 UTC, Chris wrote:
Yep. This occurred to me too. Sorry Ola, but I think you don't
know how sausages are made.
I most certainly do. I am both doing backend programming and we
have
On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 10:00 +, Chris via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
>
[…]
> Well, you know how gourmet sausages are made (100% meat), because
> you make them yourself apparently. But I was talking about the
> sausages you get out there ;) A lot of websites are not
> "planned". They are
Is there a Make-target for building and running the unittests for
a specific Phobos package, say `std.range`, only?
On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 09:35 +, Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-
d-learn wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 07:57:51 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
> > lot better than it could be. From small experiments D is (and
> > also Chapel is even more) hugely faster than Python/NumPy at
> >
On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 09:24:52 UTC, Chris wrote:
Yep. This occurred to me too. Sorry Ola, but I think you don't
know how sausages are made.
I most certainly do. I am both doing backend programming and we
have a farm... :-)
Do you really think that all the websites out there are
On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 06:48 +, data pulverizer via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
>
[…]
> A journey of a thousand miles ...
Exactly.
> I tried to start creating a data table type object by
> investigating variantArray:
> http://forum.dlang.org/thread/hhzavwrkbrkjzfohc...@forum.dlang.org
>
On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 18:17:29 UTC, Russel Winder
wrote:
The thing about Python is NumPy, SciPy, Pandas, Matplotlib,
IPython, Jupyter, GNU Radio. The data science, bioinformatics,
quant, signal provessing, etc. people do not give a sh!t which
language they used, what they want
On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 02:20:42 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 22:11:56 UTC, data pulverizer
wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 October 2015 at 23:26:14 UTC, Laeeth Isharc
wrote:
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-Python-so-popular-despite-being-so-slow
Andrei suggested posting more
On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 18:37:40 UTC, Mengu wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 05:42:12 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 October 2015 at 23:26:14 UTC, Laeeth Isharc
wrote:
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-Python-so-popular-despite-being-so-slow
Andrei suggested posting
On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 07:57:51 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
lot better than it could be. From small experiments D is (and
also Chapel is even more) hugely faster than Python/NumPy at
things Python people think NumPy is brilliant for. Expectations
Have you had a chance to look at
John Colvin wrote:
> On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 15:02:02 UTC, Shriramana Sharma
> wrote:
> What binary arithmetic operators do you need that real[] doesn't
> already support?
OMG silly me! I can already do a[] /= b[]... D is great! :-D Thanks a lot!
On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 10:00:21 UTC, Chris wrote:
about the sausages you get out there ;) A lot of websites are
not "planned". They are quickly put together to promote an idea.
They are WordPress sites... :-(
If you designed a website from a programming point of view
first, you'd
Thank you for example. I asked about it programmers at work too -
PHP guys - and they explained me how you are see usage of that
interfaces in my code. They prepare for me some "skeleton" on
which i will try to build my solution. Will be back if i will
have some code.
On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 15:45:00 UTC, Shriramana Sharma
wrote:
John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 15:02:02 UTC, Shriramana
Sharma
wrote:
What binary arithmetic operators do you need that real[]
doesn't
already support?
OMG silly me! I can already do a[] /= b[]...
On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 10:07:29 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Is there a Make-target for building and running the unittests
for a specific Phobos package, say `std.range`, only?
make -f posix.mak std/range.test
On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 07:57:51 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 06:48 +, data pulverizer via
Digitalmars-d- learn wrote:
Just because D doesn't have this now doesn't mean it cannot. C
doesn't have such capability but R and Python do even though R
and CPython are
On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 13:12:32 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
make -f posix.mak std/range.test
Thx
On 16/10/15 4:14 PM, holo wrote:
I created interface IfRequestHandler it is used only by one class
RequestHandlerXML right now but thanks to such solution i can create
more classes with same interface which can handle it in different way..
eg second can be RequestHandlerCSVReport or
On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 15:25:22 UTC, David DeWitt wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 14:48:22 UTC, John Colvin
wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 14:32:00 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 October 2015 at 23:26:14 UTC, Laeeth Isharc
wrote:
I get it in dmd 2.068.2 and dmd 2.069-b2. I think, that this
behavior some strange:
I have some code:
enum int m = 10;
enum int n = 5;
ubyte[m][n] array;
for(int x = 0; x < m; x++) {
for(int y = 0; y < n; y++) {
array[x][y] = cast(ubyte)(x + y);
}
}
In
On 16/10/15 3:39 PM, VlasovRoman wrote:
enum int m = 10;
enum int n = 5;
ubyte[m][n] array;
for(int x = 0; x < m; x++) {
for(int y = 0; y < n; y++) {
array[x][y] = cast(ubyte)(x + y);
}
}
First on the left(declaration), last on the right(index/assign).
void main()
{
There are two these different ways to pass functions as template
arguments. Which is preferred?
---
void funcA(alias calle)()
{
calle();
}
void funcB(T)(T calle)
{
calle();
}
void main()
{
funcA!(() => 0);
funcB(() => 0);
}
---
On Friday, 16 October 2015 at 02:46:03 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 16/10/15 3:39 PM, VlasovRoman wrote:
enum int m = 10;
enum int n = 5;
ubyte[m][n] array;
for(int x = 0; x < m; x++) {
for(int y = 0; y < n; y++) {
array[x][y] = cast(ubyte)(x + y);
}
}
First on the
I created interface IfRequestHandler it is used only by one class
RequestHandlerXML right now but thanks to such solution i can
create more classes with same interface which can handle it in
different way.. eg second can be RequestHandlerCSVReport or
RequestHandlerSendViaEmail. Is it this what
Ah missed your post before replying to H.S. Teoh (I should
refresh more often).
Thanks for reply.
On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 19:50:27 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
Without more context, I would say no. assumeSafeAppend is an
assumption, and therefore unsafe. If you don't know what
On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 22:11:56 UTC, data pulverizer
wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 October 2015 at 23:26:14 UTC, Laeeth Isharc
wrote:
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-Python-so-popular-despite-being-so-slow
Andrei suggested posting more widely.
I am coming at D by way of R, C++, Python etc. so
On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 07:57:51 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 06:48 +, data pulverizer via
Digitalmars-d- learn wrote:
[…]
A journey of a thousand miles ...
Exactly.
I tried to start creating a data table type object by
investigating variantArray:
On Thursday, October 15, 2015 11:48 PM, Random D user wrote:
> Should array have clear() as well?
> Basically wrap array.length = 0; array.assumeSafeAppend();
> At least it would then be symmetric (and more intuitive) with
> built-in containers.
No. "clear" is too harmless a name for it to
On 10/15/15 12:47 PM, Random D user wrote:
So I was doing some optimizations and I came up with couple basic
questions...
A)
What does assumeSafeAppend actually do?
A.1) Should I call it always if before setting length if I want to have
assumeSafeAppend semantics? (e.g. I don't know if it's
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 09:00:36PM +, Random D user via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Thanks for thorough answer.
>
> On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 18:46:22 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
> >The only thing I can think of is to implement this manually, e.g., by
> >wrapping your AA in a type
Thanks for thorough answer.
On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 18:46:22 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
It adjusts the size of the allocated block in the GC so that
subsequent appends will not reallocate.
So how does capacity affect this? I mean what is exactly a GC
block here.
Shrink to fit bit
On 16/10/15 4:02 PM, Freddy wrote:
There are two these different ways to pass functions as template
arguments. Which is preferred?
---
void funcA(alias calle)()
{
calle();
}
void funcB(T)(T calle)
{
calle();
}
void main()
{
funcA!(() => 0);
funcB(() => 0);
}
---
Depends,
On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 21:48:29 UTC, Random D user wrote:
An array uses a block marked for appending, assumeSafeAppend
simply sets how much data is assumed to be valid. Calling
assumeSafeAppend on a block not marked for appending will do
nothing except burn CPU cycles.
So yours is
On Friday, 16 October 2015 at 03:01:12 UTC, VlasovRoman wrote:
Oh, thank you. Some strange solution.
D doesn't have multidimensional built-in arrays, but rectangular
arrays. Think of it this way:
int[3] a1;
a1 is a static array of 3 ints. Indexing it returns an int. We
can think of it
On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 10:33:54 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
CUDA is of course doomed in the long run as Intel put GPGPU on
the processor chip. OpenCL will eventually be replaced with
Vulkan (assuming they can get the chips made).
I thought Vulkan was meant to replace OpenGL.
On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 17:00 +, jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 10:33:54 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
> >
> > CUDA is of course doomed in the long run as Intel put GPGPU on
> > the processor chip. OpenCL will eventually be replaced with
> > Vulkan
So I was doing some optimizations and I came up with couple basic
questions...
A)
What does assumeSafeAppend actually do?
A.1) Should I call it always if before setting length if I want
to have assumeSafeAppend semantics? (e.g. I don't know if it's
called just before the function I'm in)
A.2)
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 04:47:35PM +, Random D user via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> So I was doing some optimizations and I came up with couple basic
> questions...
>
> A)
> What does assumeSafeAppend actually do?
It adjusts the size of the allocated block in the GC so that subsequent
38 matches
Mail list logo
