On Thursday, 29 December 2016 at 09:57:25 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On Thursday, 29 December 2016 at 09:24:23 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
Sorry for delay in following up on this. Yes, the same
problem occurs with dmd 2.071 (as installed from the deb
package downloaded from
Hi,
On my first attempt to create a templated class, I'm hitting an
issue that I can't seem to resolve.
I've dustmite'd the code down to:
class Cache(O, K, F)
{
}
void main()
{
class BasicObject
{
}
BasicObject lookupBasicObject() {
}
On Sunday, 8 January 2017 at 03:27:26 UTC, Fabrice Marie wrote:
Hi,
On my first attempt to create a templated class, I'm hitting an
issue that I can't seem to resolve.
I've dustmite'd the code down to:
class Cache(O, K, F)
{
}
void main()
{
class BasicObject
{
}
On Sunday, 8 January 2017 at 03:27:26 UTC, Fabrice Marie wrote:
void main()
{
Cache!(BasicObject, string, lookupBasicObject);
}
In addition to what Nicholas Wilson said, what you're doing here
is the equivalent of writing `int;`. It doesn't make any sense as
Cache!(...) is
On Saturday, 7 January 2017 at 19:50:14 UTC, dewitt wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 at 04:50:55 UTC, xtreak wrote:
I am newbie to D learning it for sometime using Ali's book. I
came across std.experimental.allocator and read through
On Saturday, 7 January 2017 at 13:45:53 UTC, crimaniak wrote:
Ok, I found it: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16044
yep. sorry, my search-fu is completely broken, so i didn't
provide you with the number.
On Saturday, 7 January 2017 at 12:11:20 UTC, crimaniak wrote:
Is this a bug or documentation problem?
well, it's hard to say. package.d is one of the cases where you
*have* to provide explicit module definition. ;-) 'cause implicit
one creates module with name `package`, which is teh
On Saturday, 7 January 2017 at 10:38:29 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Saturday, 7 January 2017 at 10:27:51 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
Do you require a module statement per chance?
it doesn't matter. if there is no explicit module declaration,
compiler will insert implicit one. from the code PoV,
p.s.: otherwise, it *should* work with explicit module
declaration. but then, we have some well-known bugs with
cross-module introspection, and some heisenbugs with package
introspection.
On Saturday, 7 January 2017 at 12:29:34 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Saturday, 7 January 2017 at 12:11:20 UTC, crimaniak wrote:
Is this a bug or documentation problem?
well, it's hard to say. package.d is one of the cases where you
*have* to provide explicit module definition. ;-) 'cause
implicit
On Sunday, 18 September 2016 at 01:44:10 UTC, Ryan wrote:
I think it works because each time you call dispose it tells
the GC to mark that memory as available, without the GC needing
to do a collection sweep. This could be a really useful tip in
the allocators section, as I see converting to
I'm working on writing an RSA implementation, but I've run into a
roadblock generating primes. With a more than 9 bits, my program
either hangs for a long time (utilizing %100 CPU!) or returns a
composite number. With 9 or fewer bits, I get primes, but I have
to run with a huge number of
Ok, I found it: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16044
Hi!
I need to iterate module members and find specific classes (and
make tuple).
class foo{};
pragma (msg, __traits(allMembers,mixin(__MODULE__)));
gives me empty tuple. I found also this thread from 2011:
On Saturday, 7 January 2017 at 09:46:54 UTC, crimaniak wrote:
Hi!
I need to iterate module members and find specific classes (and
make tuple).
class foo{};
pragma (msg, __traits(allMembers,mixin(__MODULE__)));
gives me empty tuple.
works like a charm both in 2.071 and in git HEAD.
On Saturday, 7 January 2017 at 09:46:54 UTC, crimaniak wrote:
Hi!
I need to iterate module members and find specific classes (and
make tuple).
class foo{};
pragma (msg, __traits(allMembers,mixin(__MODULE__)));
gives me empty tuple. I found also this thread from 2011:
On Saturday, 7 January 2017 at 10:27:51 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
Do you require a module statement per chance?
it doesn't matter. if there is no explicit module declaration,
compiler will insert implicit one. from the code PoV, there is no
difference at all.
17 matches
Mail list logo
