On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 05:54:00 UTC, Michael V. Franklin
wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 03:40:23 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
Is there a magic visible sign (or even one needed) in the D
language that tells D _compilers_ not to move certain types of
memory load / store operations
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 03:40:23 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
Is there a magic visible sign (or even one needed) in the D
language that tells D _compilers_ not to move certain types of
memory load / store operations forwards or backwards relative
to other operations when optimising the code
I have to apologise in advance for a truly dumb question, so
please be kind.
Is there a magic visible sign (or even one needed) in the D
language that tells D _compilers_ not to move certain types of
memory load / store operations forwards or backwards relative to
other operations when
On Sunday, 5 November 2017 at 22:47:10 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
f.multiwayMerge.chunks(128).joiner.chunkBy!(pred).writeln;
since it seems to be the iteration that stuff things up and
this changes it.
If that doesn't work you could try rolling your own version of
chunk with `take` and a
On Sunday, 5 November 2017 at 13:32:57 UTC, Matthew Gamble wrote:
On Sunday, 5 November 2017 at 03:21:06 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 18:57:17 UTC, Matthew Gamble
wrote:
[...]
It should, this looks like a bug somewhere, please file one at
issues.dlang.org/ .
I am trying to build something like the asynchronous Sockets from
C# .NET but I'm stuck at the accepting phase.
My code is something like this:
public class TCPListener {
ushort _port;
string _address;
bool _active;
string _lineEnd;
ubyte[] _messageBuffer;
Socket
On Sunday, 5 November 2017 at 14:27:18 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote:
On Sunday, 5 November 2017 at 13:43:15 UTC, user1234 wrote:
[...]
One of the problems is that "naked" is missing in your
assembly. If you write
asm pure nothrow
{
naked;
mov RAX, 1;
ret;
On Sunday, 5 November 2017 at 13:43:15 UTC, user1234 wrote:
[...]
Hmmm it was just the amount of nops.
---
import std.stdio;
alias Proc = size_t function();
size_t allInnOne()
{
asm pure nothrow
{
naked;
mov RAX, 1;
ret;
nop;nop;
mov RAX, 2;
On Sunday, 5 November 2017 at 13:43:15 UTC, user1234 wrote:
Hello, try this:
---
import std.stdio;
alias Proc = size_t function();
size_t allInnOne()
{
asm pure nothrow
{
mov RAX, 1;
ret;
nop;nop;nop;nop;nop;nop;nop;
mov RAX, 2;
ret;
}
}
Hello, try this:
---
import std.stdio;
alias Proc = size_t function();
size_t allInnOne()
{
asm pure nothrow
{
mov RAX, 1;
ret;
nop;nop;nop;nop;nop;nop;nop;
mov RAX, 2;
ret;
}
}
void main()
{
Proc proc1 =
Proc proc2 = cast(Proc)
On Sunday, 5 November 2017 at 03:21:06 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 18:57:17 UTC, Matthew Gamble
wrote:
[...]
It should, this looks like a bug somewhere, please file one at
issues.dlang.org/ .
in the mean time
struct Replicate(T)
{
Tuple!(T, uint) e;
On Sunday, 5 November 2017 at 07:07:43 UTC, Aurelien Fredouelle
wrote:
struct S { }
class A
{
S s;
alias s this;
}
class B : A
{
}
void main()
{
A asA = new B;
B asB = cast(B)asA;
}
I would expect the last line to successfully cast the B
instance I created back into type B, however
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 21:54:14 UTC, ciechowoj wrote:
What is the fastest way to have the detailed debug info for
druntime? I have a program that fails in Fiber constructor
after I create and delete at least 68_209 Fibers one after
another. For 68_208 works fine, one more and it
The following code does not compile:
struct S { }
class A
{
S s;
alias s this;
}
class B : A
{
}
void main()
{
A asA = new B;
B asB = cast(B)asA;
}
I would expect the last line to successfully cast the B instance
I created back into type B, however this seems to be preempted by
the
14 matches
Mail list logo
