On Thursday, 31 October 2019 at 13:46:07 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2019 at 03:56:56 UTC, lili wrote:
Hi:
why writeln need GC?
It almost never does, it just keeps the option open in case
* it needs to throw an exception (like if stdout is closed)
* you pass it a
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 09:52:08AM +0100, Robert M. Münch via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On 2019-10-30 15:12:29 +, H. S. Teoh said:
[...]
> > Do you mean *simulated* 128-bit reals (e.g. with a pair of 64-bit
> > doubles), or do you mean actual IEEE 128-bit reals?
>
> Simulated, because HW
e.g. here: https://dlang.org/library/object/destroy.html
I was confused at first by the trailing
if (!is(T == struct) && !is(T == interface) && !is(T == class)
&& !__traits(isStaticArray, T));
after I somehow managed to completely parse that page without
recognizing all other constraints.
On Thursday, 31 October 2019 at 03:56:56 UTC, lili wrote:
Hi:
why writeln need GC?
It almost never does, it just keeps the option open in case
* it needs to throw an exception (like if stdout is closed)
* you pass it a custom type with toString that uses GC
@nogc is just super strict and
On Thursday, 31 October 2019 at 15:11:42 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş
wrote:
It would be nice if one reimplement writeln of Phobos by
bypassing gc and use a custom nogc exception as described
here*? Of course I can imagine that it would be a breaking
change in the language and requires so much work
On Thursday, 31 October 2019 at 12:37:55 UTC, user1234 wrote:
struct S
{
S*[] children;
}
because otherwise when you declare the array the compiler has
not finished the semantic ana of S.
---
struct Test
{
Test[] t;
}
---
Works today. Putting pointers into the container (and thus
On 2019-10-31 16:07:07 +, H. S. Teoh said:
Maybe you might be interested in this:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6769881/emulate-double-using-2-floats
Thanks, I know the 2nd mentioned paper.
Maybe switch to PPC? :-D
Well, our customers don't use PPC Laptops ;-)
On Thursday, 31 October 2019 at 03:56:56 UTC, lili wrote:
Hi:
why writeln need GC?
I cannot answer why it needs GC but something can be implemented
like:
import core.stdc.stdio;
struct Point {
int x;
int y;
}
class Person {
string name;
uint age;
}
template
On Thursday, 31 October 2019 at 11:47:41 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
girtod can be found here:
https://github.com/gtkd-developers/gir-to-d
It's a tool that generates a D Binding from GObject
Introspection files, if you use the GTK installer from the gtkd
website or msys2 the needed introspection
On Wednesday, 30 October 2019 at 19:11:00 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2019 at 19:48:33 UTC, Murilo wrote:
I play a sound the program never ends, the terminal continues
to run the program and I have to end it manually. Any ideas
what could be causing this? I am using it
On Wednesday, 30 October 2019 at 22:26:41 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
---
girtod -i src --use-runtime-linker --use-bind-dir
---
Hmmm... I'll need more information, I'm afraid. I Googled, but
I'm not finding any instructions for building these DLLs.
On 31-10-2019 12:16, Ron Tarrant wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 October 2019 at 22:26:41 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
---
girtod -i src --use-runtime-linker --use-bind-dir
---
Hmmm... I'll need more information, I'm afraid. I Googled, but I'm not
finding any instructions for building these DLLs.
girtod
Hi:
I want implementation Lua on D, I find that a PEG parser
https://github.com/PhilippeSigaud/Pegged
why do not use BNF parser. Is PEG better than BNF?
On 2019-10-30 15:12:29 +, H. S. Teoh said:
It wasn't a wrong *decision* per se, but a wrong *prediction* of where
the industry would be headed.
Fair point...
Walter was expecting that people would move towards higher precision,
but what with SSE2 and other such trends, and the general
On Wednesday, 23 October 2019 at 11:20:59 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Does DMD/LDC avoid range-checking in slice-expressions such as
the one in my array-overload of `startsWith` defined as
bool startsWith(T)(scope const(T)[] haystack,
scope const(T)[] needle)
{
if
My Problem:
--- (https://run.dlang.io/is/CfLscj)
import std.container.array;
import std.traits;
struct Test
{
Test[] t;
}
struct Test2
{
Array!Test2 t;
}
int main()
{
return FieldTypeTuple!Test.length + FieldTypeTuple!Test2;
}
---
I've found
On Thursday, 31 October 2019 at 12:29:28 UTC, Tobias Pankrath
wrote:
My Problem:
--- (https://run.dlang.io/is/CfLscj)
import std.container.array;
import std.traits;
struct Test
{
Test[] t;
}
struct Test2
{
Array!Test2 t;
}
int main()
{
return FieldTypeTuple!Test.length +
On Thursday, 31 October 2019 at 12:37:55 UTC, user1234 wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2019 at 12:29:28 UTC, Tobias Pankrath
wrote:
[...]
Try
struct S
{
S*[] children;
}
because otherwise when you declare the array the compiler has
not finished the semantic ana of S.
so S size is not
18 matches
Mail list logo
