On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 13:36:29 UTC, burt wrote:
Sorry, I must have misread this. My LDC version was 1.20.1, not
1.19.
did that fix the linker error?
The runtimes it downloads are specifically built against 1.19.
But libs for the other versions are available too, you just need
to
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 14:16:28 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 14:13:32 UTC, burt wrote:
I also wonder if there's a difference between the
libphobos2-ldc and libphobos2-ldc-debug.a libraries? Do those
mangle differently and could that cause the linker errors?
On Tuesday, 31 March 2020 at 15:23:48 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
I have a library package that I split up into subpackages, but
I'm having to do mental gymnastics to make it only compile the
files I want.
The problem is that even if you specify some `sourceFiles`, it
will build everything under
Hi,
I'm trying to compile a simple app with D code to Android and
trying to use the d_android library for this. While trying to
compile a basic sample, I found a README [0] that mentions an
"android-dub-build.d" script, which should be a wrapper around
`dub build`, but I cannot find this
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 08:50:01 UTC, burt wrote:
I found a README [0] that mentions an "android-dub-build.d"
script, which should be a wrapper around `dub build`
Ah, I forgot to update that file. There is no android-dub-build
anymore, instead the android-setup changes the main
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 02:15:25 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/31/20 4:43 PM, GreatSam4sure wrote:
[...]
Vibe does not render templates automatically. You have to
render them from a function. The function can be in a route
that has nothing to do with the name of the template.
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 11:57:58 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 08:50:01 UTC, burt wrote:
I found a README [0] that mentions an "android-dub-build.d"
script, which should be a wrapper around `dub build`
Ah, I forgot to update that file. There is no
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 06:48:09 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
You have not enabled optimizations. You should compile with `-O
-release -inline` to enable all optimizations.
-release should *never* be used. You're trading memory safety and
security holes for a few microseconds of execution
On Tuesday, 31 March 2020 at 12:52:09 UTC, Ahmat wrote:
Hi all,
I want to use vibe.d for my personal website hosted on Github
pages. I am not familiar with vibe.d and I am confused about
how to approach this.
Any suggestions, ideas ? I will appreciate your help.
as Mathias said, GitHub
On Tuesday, 31 March 2020 at 15:23:48 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
I have a library package that I split up into subpackages, but
I'm having to do mental gymnastics to make it only compile the
files I want.
[...]
how about targetType "none" if you don't have any source in the
main package but
On 2020-03-31 23:30, data pulverizer wrote:
$ dmd fill.d && ./fill
You have not enabled optimizations. You should compile with `-O -release
-inline` to enable all optimizations.
Without optimizations I get numbers like these:
Slice: Mean time(usecs): 92.91, Standard Deviation: 49.8002
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 02:08:09 UTC, mitchell wrote:
Hello,
I've just finished migrating a project from GDC/Makefile to LDC
with dub. The program now compiles and runs, and works fine
until such time as the following error occurs:
Aborting from core/sync/mutex.d(147) Error:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 14:00:39 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 13:36:29 UTC, burt wrote:
Sorry, I must have misread this. My LDC version was 1.20.1,
not 1.19.
did that fix the linker error?
The runtimes it downloads are specifically built against 1.19.
But
On 4/1/20 11:23 AM, data pulverizer wrote:
Thanks for all the suggestions made so far. I am still interested in
looking at the implementation details of the slice assign `arr[] = x`
which I can't seem to find. Before I made my initial post, I tried doing
a `memcpy` and `memmove` under a `for`
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 14:13:32 UTC, burt wrote:
I also wonder if there's a difference between the
libphobos2-ldc and libphobos2-ldc-debug.a libraries? Do those
mangle differently and could that cause the linker errors?
maybe. what are the errors?
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 15:01:02 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 14:54:35 UTC, burt wrote:
libphobos2-ldc.a and libphobos2-ldc-debug.a. Sizes are 2511
kB, 4792 kB, 10.010 kB and 17.378 kB respectively.
Those latter two should be megabytes not kilobytes the
So the correct steps now:
1) get ldc 1.19 specifically and the android NDK
2) do `android-setup /path/to/your/android/ndk`
3) do normal `dub build`
Sorry, I must have misread this. My LDC version was 1.20.1, not
1.19.
Thanks
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 14:31:45 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 14:20:25 UTC, burt wrote:
Some examples of errors are:
Those mean it isn't linking in the libs at all... ugh.
do
ldc2 -v
and it will tell you where the config file is.
open that up and see if it
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 14:54:35 UTC, burt wrote:
libphobos2-ldc.a and libphobos2-ldc-debug.a. Sizes are 2511 kB,
4792 kB, 10.010 kB and 17.378 kB respectively.
Those latter two should be megabytes not kilobytes the
download must have failed.
can i come back to it in a few hours?
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 12:22:48 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 06:48:09 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
You have not enabled optimizations. You should compile with
`-O -release -inline` to enable all optimizations.
-release should *never* be used. You're trading
Thanks for all the suggestions made so far. I am still interested
in looking at the implementation details of the slice assign
`arr[] = x` which I can't seem to find. Before I made my initial
post, I tried doing a `memcpy` and `memmove` under a `for` loop
but it did not change the performance
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 14:20:25 UTC, burt wrote:
Some examples of errors are:
Those mean it isn't linking in the libs at all... ugh.
do
ldc2 -v
and it will tell you where the config file is.
open that up and see if it has teh correct paths under a section
that looks kinda like
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 15:04:44 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
It is nice that bounds checks remain in place when using
release and the code is @safe.
Yeah, it used to be even worse than it is now, but it is still a
terrible switch that should NEVER be used. There are always
better ways
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 06:48:09 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I you care about performance you should really compile using
LDC (with `-O5 -release -flto=full
-defaultlib=phobos2-ldc-lto,druntime-ldc-lto`), which usually
produces much better code:
Slice: Mean time(usecs): 50.58, Standard
On 4/1/20 3:35 PM, Net wrote:
from the below code, the expression "case [c]":
void main()
{
import std.stdio, std.string, std.algorithm, std.conv;
// Reduce the RPN expression using a stack
readln.split.fold!((stack, op)
{
switch (op)
{
//
oh, i see. That was a dump question. I don't code in D has been a
while and totally forget to create a new array was as simple as []
I want to do like
static if(__LDC_VERSION == 1.19) {
// declaration
}
All the tricks I know that I have tried so far give the dmd
numbers. Perhaps I could use that to identify a particular
version as a hack, but I specifically am curious about the ldc
version because of a change they made
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 19:35:30 UTC, Net wrote:
from the below code, the expression "case [c]":
That's just an array literal, so the same as like
"" ~ c
Is it true that user defined types are resolved to ScopeDsymbol and
basic types aren't?
from the below code, the expression "case [c]":
void main()
{
import std.stdio, std.string, std.algorithm, std.conv;
// Reduce the RPN expression using a stack
readln.split.fold!((stack, op)
{
switch (op)
{
// Generate operator switch cases statically
On Thursday, 2 April 2020 at 01:27:26 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
https://github.com/ldc-developers/druntime/blob/ldc/src/ldc/intrinsics.di#L22-L34
ah excellent that will do. thanks!
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 02:27:38 UTC, YD wrote:
Thanks for the reply! BTW is hunt-amqp for AMQP 1.0 only?
Because when I try it on an AMQP 0.9 server, it does not seem
to connect. Thanks again!
We are using RabbitMQ v3.8.2 for test. The hunt-amqp is based on
AMQP 1.0, and is not tested
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 21:19:54 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I want to do like
static if(__LDC_VERSION == 1.19) {
// declaration
}
All the tricks I know that I have tried so far give the dmd
numbers. Perhaps I could use that to identify a particular
version as a hack, but I
Exemple:
Inside folder Project I have ten folders. How can I add this ten
folders using dmd and -J command? I don't want add one by one.
On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 at 15:04:02 UTC, burt wrote:
Well I'm European, so with 10.010 kB I mean 10010 kB = 10.010
MB in American/British.
ah, of course.
Well, I won't be able to finish it today anyway, so take your
time.
I rewrote the downloader so it goes straight from ldc releases
35 matches
Mail list logo
