On 11/8/20 6:58 PM, rikki cattermole wrote:
> On 09/11/2020 2:58 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> Does the D GC know the complete function call stack of the C program
>> all the way up from 'main'? Is there the concept of "bottom of the
>> stack"
>
On 09/11/2020 2:58 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Does the D GC know the complete function call stack of the C program all
the way up from 'main'? Is there the concept of "bottom of the stack" or
does the D GC can only know the value of the stack pointer at the time
rt_init() was called. If the
On 10/25/20 3:19 AM, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 25/10/2020 11:03 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Does the GC see that local variable 'name' that is on the C side? What
I don't know is whether the GC is aware only of the stack frames of D
functions or the entire thread, which would include the C
On Sunday, 8 November 2020 at 19:29:39 UTC, frame wrote:
On Sunday, 8 November 2020 at 16:30:40 UTC, Vino wrote:
Request your help on how to get the first value of "type"
from the below json, the expected output required is as below,
You need a data structure to work with, eg:
static
On Sunday, 8 November 2020 at 16:30:40 UTC, Vino wrote:
Request your help on how to get the first value of "type"
from the below json, the expected output required is as below,
You need a data structure to work with, eg:
static struct S {
string characteristicValue;
}
foreach (ref j;
Hi All,
Request your help on how to get the first value of "type" from
the below json, the expected output required is as below,
{"characteristicValue":"TT,t...@dev.com,DEV"}
output1: TT
output2: t...@dev.com
Code:
/+dub.sdl:
dependency "asdf" version="~>0.6.6"
+/
import std;
import
On 2020-11-05 23:48, Marcone wrote:
How add class or struct member after construction? Is it possible in D?
How?
It depends on what needs you have. You can declare a free function that
takes the class/struct as the first parameter and call it like a method [1]:
class Foo
{
int a;
}
On 2020-11-08 13:39, Kagamin wrote:
Surrogate pairs are used in rules because java strings are utf-16
encoded, it doesn't make much sense for other encodings.
D supports the UTF-16 encoding as well. The compiler doesn't accept the
surrogate pairs even for UTF-16 strings.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Sunday, 8 November 2020 at 13:57:08 UTC, Jan Hönig wrote:
So it's like inheritance resolved at compile time. It's
inheritance with virtual member functions without overhead.
I am guessing only one alias works.
And we use this, because struct can't do inheritance and
interface is abstract.
On Sunday, 8 November 2020 at 13:10:33 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 8 November 2020 at 10:03:46 UTC, Jan Hönig wrote:
Is there some recourse, which explains the `alias
this`?
If your object is used in a way that doesn't compile, the
compiler will change `obj` to
On 11/8/20 5:47 AM, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Saturday, 7 November 2020 at 17:49:54 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-16#U+D800_to_U+DFFF
Thanks!
I'm only using these UTF characters to create ranges that source code
characters as checked against during parsing.
On Sunday, 8 November 2020 at 10:03:46 UTC, Jan Hönig wrote:
Is there some recourse, which explains the `alias
this`?
If your object is used in a way that doesn't compile, the
compiler will change `obj` to `obj.whatever_alias_this_is` and
try again.
So say you have
struct S {
int a;
On Sunday, 8 November 2020 at 10:47:34 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
dchar
Surrogate pairs are used in rules because java strings are utf-16
encoded, it doesn't make much sense for other encodings.
On Sunday, 8 November 2020 at 10:47:34 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
cast(dchar)0xd8000
To clarify,
enum dch1 = cast(dchar)0xa0a0;
enum dch2 = '\ua0a0';
assert(dch1 == dch2);
works. Can I use the first-variant if I want to postpone these
encoding questions for now?
On Saturday, 7 November 2020 at 17:49:54 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-16#U+D800_to_U+DFFF
Thanks!
I'm only using these UTF characters to create ranges that source
code characters as checked against during parsing. Therefore I
would like to just convert
On Saturday, 7 November 2020 at 18:31:18 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
Indexing and slicing are implemented with `alias expand this`,
which causes `t[i]` to be lowered to `t.expand[i]`.
Is there some recourse, which explains the `alias
this`? I still don't understand what it does. I can't imagine
16 matches
Mail list logo
