John schrieb:
BCS Wrote:
Reply to John,
Hello!
I'm wanting to use D to send a PDF to a printer. Is there an easy way
to do this? Also, I may need to set which tray to go to and whether it
should duplex or not.
Could someone help me out?
THANKS!
You would do it the same way that it would
Hi,
I would like to pre-create a double array, each element is calculated by
a function.
//-
import std.stdio;
import std.conv;
import std.string;
template f(int N)
{
bool fn(double[] tb)
{
for (int i = 1; i
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 01:26:29 -0600, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
wchar[] w = (true)? true:false;
-- Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (true) of type char[]
to wchar[]
or should it be reported as a bug?
It is not a bug. A string literal such as true is a char[] type (UTF8),
and
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
When I first started learning D I decided that a good way to learn it
would be by porting a popular java api (mind, I didn't say intelligent),
which came complete with a few cyclic dependencies. At the moment, I'm
using GDC, and it refuses to swallow cyclic dependencies.
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Hello all,
I began learning D a few months ago, and now I have a question about
cyclic dependencies (and some random whining).
I come from a java background and have had no serious exposure to C++.
In java, cyclic dependencies are legit to the best of my knowledge.
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 10:26:29 +0300, Ellery Newcomer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, I would be trying to compile with DMD, but I have evidently
managed to crash the compiler, and I don't know if it's DMD's fault or
mine. It reports an Internal Error in e2ir.c at line 3904. (not being a
C++
BLS Wrote:
John schrieb:
BCS Wrote:
Reply to John,
Hello!
I'm wanting to use D to send a PDF to a printer. Is there an easy way
to do this? Also, I may need to set which tray to go to and whether it
should duplex or not.
Could someone help me out?
THANKS!
You would
poly Wrote:
asm
{
call Label1;
Label1: pop ECX;
mov EAX, Label1; //error reported on this line
}
I tried several tricks, seems like compiler doesn't support this.
Dan W:
1: Even though D has an automatic garbage collector, is one still
allowed to free the memory of a malloced array manually (using free
() ), to avoid pauses in the program?
Other people here will just answer your question. But remember that in D manual
memory management is done only in
The Anh Tran wrote:
static double[N] dd = void;
dd is not a compile-time constant.
static auto tmp = f!(N).fn(dd);
The initializer of tmp must be a compile-time constant, but since dd is
not a compile-time constant, you can't use CTFE on fn.
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Jarrett Billingsley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Daniel White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for that reply. I wonder if extending automatic garbage
collection for malloced memory would be a good idea...
That would be a bad idea.
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Steven Schveighoffer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure about this problem. I've not encountered it, but it sounds
weird that it would cause a runtime error...
It is weird.
[a.d]
module a;
import b;
static this(){}
void main(){}
[b.d]
module
Derek Parnell wrote:
It is not a bug. A string literal such as true is a char[] type
(UTF8),
and the compiler will not implicitly convert UTF8 to UTF16 (wchar[]).
Which would then beg the obvious
wchar[] w = true;
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Daniel White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would be a bad idea. Then how would you do manual memory
management in the few cases that absolutely require it?
Two ways. Either:
a: being able to lock the variable so that the garbage collector
can't touch it
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Ellery Newcomer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Derek Parnell wrote:
It is not a bug. A string literal such as true is a char[] type (UTF8),
and the compiler will not implicitly convert UTF8 to UTF16 (wchar[]).
Which would then beg the
Jarrett Billingsley wrote
It can obviously be argued that since the operands of ?: are constant,
the compiler _could_ figure out that they should be of type wchar[],
but that would make the semantic analysis more complicated, and since
appending 'w' to the strings is far easier, it probably
I'm trying derive a class from a nested base class. The programs' structure is
as follows:
class A
{
class B
{
}
}
class C : A
{
class D : B
{
}
}
I'm using version 2.014 of the dmd compiler, and the above fails. The compiler
error reports that B is nested in
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 2:08 PM, llee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying derive a class from a nested base class. The programs' structure
is as follows:
class A
{
class B
{
}
}
class C : A
{
class D : B
{
}
}
I'm using version 2.014 of the dmd compiler,
Reply to llee,
I'm trying derive a class from a nested base class. The programs'
structure is as follows:
class A
{
class B
{
}
}
class C : A
{
class D : B
{
}
}
I'm using version 2.014 of the dmd compiler, and the above fails. The
compiler error reports that B is nested in class A and not C.
Daniel White wrote:
That would be a bad idea. Then how would you do manual memory
management in the few cases that absolutely require it?
Two ways. Either:
a: being able to lock the variable so that the garbage collector
can't touch it until you unlock it.
If you have a reference to the
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:40:47 +0300, tsalm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
How to implement an object that can do this :
myClass.add(something)(otherthings)(thisToo);
Is it possible ?
TIA,
TSalm
Yes:
import std.stdio;
class MyClass
{
class MyClassAdder
{
MyClassAdder
Reply to TSalm,
Hello,
How to implement an object that can do this :
myClass.add(something)(otherthings)(thisToo);
Is it possible ?
TIA,
TSalm
if you don't mind dropping the )(
class C
{
final void add(T...)(T t)
{
foreach(int i,_;T)
_add(t[i]);
}
//.
}
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 7:00 PM, BCS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
class C
{
final void add(T...)(T t)
{
foreach(int i,_;T)
_add(t[i]);
}
//.
}
(new C).add(something, otherthings, thisToo);
If all the params are the same type, typesafe variadics are a more
23 matches
Mail list logo
