I asked this question a couple of month ago but it is pending,is there any
solution now?
Thanks.
Sam Hu Wrote:
I asked this question a couple of month ago but it is pending,is there any
solution now?
Thanks.
Sorry,Windows (XP).
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
You only have to use scope for top-level QObject subclasses. For anything
else you should use auto. Nevertheless, it would be useful if you submit a
bug report.
Even when my application is multi-thread? I am not sure, if I can declare
QPixmap also as auto
Chad J wrote:
Given an Expression object in dmd, I'd like to know how many
subexpressions it contains and, even better, iterate over them. I'd
like to do this in a general way, without having to create cases for all
of the different kinds of Expressions. Is there some way to do this
that I've
I'm contemplating using D for an embedded project where system
configuration registers have fixed memory locations.
One way of doing it would be to have a constant pointer to a structure
with manually aligned members that match the register map, and access
them like that. This becomes
On 11/30/2009 03:53 AM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Chad J wrote:
Given an Expression object in dmd, I'd like to know how many
subexpressions it contains and, even better, iterate over them. I'd
like to do this in a general way, without having to create cases for all
of the different kinds of
Peter C. Chapin wrote:
Lutger lutger.blijdest...@gmail.com wrote in
news:hescc2$16...@digitalmars.com:
You are not missing something, this is a known issue. It has been
discussed and I believe the intention was to do something about this,
but with all the high priorities I'm not sure when
Sam Hu wrote:
Sam Hu Wrote:
I asked this question a couple of month ago but it is pending,is there any
solution now?
Thanks.
Sorry,Windows (XP).
Have you set-up an appropriate console font? There are article on the
internet on Unicode display and command console.
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
On 11/30/2009 03:53 AM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Chad J wrote:
Given an Expression object in dmd, I'd like to know how many
subexpressions it contains and, even better, iterate over them. I'd
like to do this in a general way, without having to create cases for all
of the
Hello Tomek,
I've got a problem calling an immutable getter on an ordinary
object.
struct A {
float _pole;
float pole() immutable {
return _pole;
}
}
void main() {
A a;
auto x = a.pole; // Ouch!
}
Error: function hello.A.pole () immutable is not callable using
argument types ()
immutable
On 11/30/2009 12:32 PM, Chad J wrote:
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
On 11/30/2009 03:53 AM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Chad J wrote:
Given an Expression object in dmd, I'd like to know how many
subexpressions it contains and, even better, iterate over them. I'd
like to do this in a general way, without
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
On 11/30/2009 12:32 PM, Chad J wrote:
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
On 11/30/2009 03:53 AM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Chad J wrote:
Given an Expression object in dmd, I'd like to know how many
subexpressions it contains and, even better, iterate over them. I'd
like to do this in
I think I'll reply to both of you in one post since the thoughts are
related.
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Not that I know anything about DMD outside parse.c, but in
expression.h, there be decls along the lines of
struct UnaExp{
Expression* e1;
}
struct BinExp{
Spacen Jasset Wrote:
Sam Hu wrote:
Sam Hu Wrote:
I asked this question a couple of month ago but it is pending,is there any
solution now?
Thanks.
Sorry,Windows (XP).
Have you set-up an appropriate console font? There are article on the
internet on Unicode display and command
Richard Webb Wrote:
Do you need to be calling RegOpenKeyEx with KEY_WRITE instead of KEY_READ ?
Thanks,I changed to KEY_WRITE and the function now return true when the app
executes.However the specified app dosn't start up automatically,when I check
the startup settings by some third party
Don nos...@nospam.com wrote in news:hf0obf$1th...@digitalmars.com:
void next()
in {
int original_day_m = day_m;
int original_month_m = month_m;
int original_year_m = year_m;
}
out {
assert( ... expression using original_day_m, etc ... )
On 11/30/2009 07:59 PM, Chad J wrote:
If you care for a bit of reading, I'll tell you my story and ping an idea.
This is about the property expression rewrite of course. I'd love to
just use the current convention in dmd and write the rewrite as a
non-recursive function that gets called at
17 matches
Mail list logo
