Alex Wrote:
Is it possible, using templates, tuples, or some other mechanism, to
implement named variadic arguments in D?
Do you need high performance for this code?
If not, what about using an associative array of Variant[string] as third
argument? It's not a nice solution.
Bye,
bearophile
Do you need high performance for this code?
If not, what about using an associative array of Variant[string] as third
argument? It's not a nice solution.
It's not a nice solution, but that's essentially what Python does in such
situation:
def foo(x, y, **kwds):
# here kwds is a dict of
Alex wrote:
Is it possible, using templates, tuples, or some other mechanism, to
implement named variadic arguments in D?
For example, I'd like to be able to do something like...
foo( 2, bar, age : 10, status : down);
and so forth.
Yes, with a small hack.
typedef int age_type;
When I started D, it was possible to define a scope class like this.
scope class Something
{
// blah
}
An instance declaration would then _require_ the scope storage class.
{
scope Something myVar;
// do something with Something
}
Is there a use case for such a feature.?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
#ponce wrote:
When I started D, it was possible to define a scope class like this.
scope class Something
{
// blah
}
An instance declaration would then _require_ the scope storage class.
{
scope Something myVar;
// do something
Hello Strt,
Lutger Wrote:
On 01/03/2010 04:31 AM, Strt wrote:
How can I generate some sort of call diagram from my D code?
you can compile with (dmd) -profile and run the executable. This
produces a file called trace.log which contains timings for each
function and a call graph. It
